AI Rate Professor

Music

Steffan Orozco

MIS4 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unfair grading and bare-minimum teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderBare minimum lecturesArbitrary gradingLots of homeworkAvoid
  • Single review alleges grading based on personal liking rather than work quality.
  • Lectures described as minimal effort with lots of homework and .
  • reported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Reviewer reports partial credit despite completed work while .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Difficulty rated 5/5 with lots of homework and minimal lecture support.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

In-person only; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Sole review is strongly negative with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Student says he does the bare minimum and lectures with minimal effort.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Projects and assignments appear central; .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MIS4 described as , and .

Main concern

Perceived favoritism in grading and weak instruction.

What students said

“He basically grades on whether or not he likes you personally.”
MIS4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format; .

Project grading unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints focus on project and .

Unclear project grading
“Someone taking this , while I would get partial credit even though I did the projects.”
MIS4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He basically grades on whether or not he likes you personally.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review only. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Overall, he does the bare minimum.”

⚖️

12/100

“He basically grades on whether or not he likes you personally.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Lots of homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Minimal effort for lectures.
  • Overall, he does the bare minimum.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • grades on whether or not he likes you personally

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent review with no corroborating sample makes confidence very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MIS41 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values