AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jeffrey Warsinksi

MAT5 · MAT12 · MAT361A1B · MAT12H · MATH5 · MAT1A · MATH12 · MAT10 · MATH10 · MAT1032874 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
96.15%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and a fair path to an A.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCheat sheet examsOptional homeworkClear lecturesCaring and chillHighly recommended
  • Nearly all students call him one of the .
  • Cheat sheets, clear packets, and .
  • , but showing up and practicing still pays off.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Do the work, use the allowed cheat sheet, and many students report A or A+ with curves and .

Online and in-person both describe attainable As; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Material is still college math, but and group practice .

Both formats call content manageable when you watch or attend lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but many tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; in person is mixed with stronger skip-at-your-risk language.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Roughly 96 percent would take him again and repeatedly call him the .

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and legal cheat sheets keep grading student-friendly.

Format shift

Online notes flexible due dates; in person stresses cheat sheets and curves.

Workload

Light

78/100

; main effort is attending, notes, and test prep.

Format shift

but should not pile up; in person often has little required HW.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

, and genuine care across courses.

Format shift

Online lecture videos and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and sometimes presentations .

Format shift

In person often allows cheat sheets and ; online exams mirror lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person he is praised for packets, group problem solving, , and a chill approachable style.

Main concern

A few weaker math students still struggle if they cannot follow lecture pace.

What students said

“For lets you use. Yes even the final!”
MAT12
“By far the best teacher I've had at Norco College.”
MATH10
“he made my first time taking calculus a breeze!”
MAT1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online pandemic-era , and enjoyable stats content.

Main concern

if .

What students said

“he made this class incredibly enjoyable. , and the exams are incredibly similar to the lectures.”
MAT12
“his lecture videos are so clear and informative!! He is very flexible with homework and regularly extends due dates”
MAT12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as fair and manageable with full cheat sheets and practice aligned to lectures.

Cheat sheet allowedTake-home quizzesExams similar to lecturesNon-spicy exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams commonly allow a full cheat sheet, including the .

Cheat sheet allowedTake-home quizzesNon-spicy exams
“ , and legal cheat sheets.”
MAT12H
“Allows you to have a cheat sheet for tests which makes this class easier to pass. .”
MATH12

Online

Online students say exams closely match lecture content with .

Exams similar to lecturesClear grading criteria
“the .”
MAT12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (2 online, 24 in person), highlighting teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Professor Warsinski was a phenomenal teacher. They put so much care into their lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ !!!”

📝

86/100

“For lets you use. Yes even the final!”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“ for exams, is always willing to go over concepts over and over until a student completely understands”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made Statistics fun
  • His notes are also the best
  • lectures are straight forward and easy to follow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Put in the work and you will get an A
  • class is easy to pass
  • doesn't mean an easy A though

Theme 3

🧾

  • legal cheat sheets

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six detailed reviews across years and formats show highly consistent praise and only one strong outlier.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT1210 reviews
MAT104 reviews
MATH123 reviews
MAT1A2 reviews
345221 review
Show 6 more courses
MAT10328741 review
MAT12H1 review
MAT361A1B1 review
MAT51 review
MATH101 review
MATH51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 12

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values