AI Rate Professor

Economics

Peter Boleman

ECON7ECON8 · ECO8 · ECO3710 · ECON7 · ECO7 · ECO3333 · ECO35307 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Prefer him in person if you will attend and study; and exam-driven.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyMixed ReviewsNotecard ExamsLecture DependentOnline Self Study
  • and notecard-allowed exams when they attend.
  • sparse , and locked question navigation.
  • , so experience depends heavily on format and study habits.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Notecards and , but and a C- online show an A still takes real study.

; in person notecards and lectures make grades more manageable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

simple when lectures .

In-person lectures lower perceived difficulty; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Multiple in-person comments say attendance is vital; but .

In ; online is more optional yet unsupported.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again sits near 40 percent with strong fans in person and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Notecards help some exams, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online comments .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Expect McGraw Hill or ; volume is steady rather than featherlight.

Format shift

Online students emphasize more homework and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call lectures amazing and funny; others .

Format shift

Teaching quality scores higher in person than online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews repeatedly tag test-heavy grading with .

Format shift

; online makes tests even more decisive.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person, several students praise , and accessibility, while others call him tough or hard.

Main concern

Attendance and serious studying matter; some still find him a .

What students said

“Ignore the bad reviews. I took this class in person and his lectures were amazing. Made everything simple.”
ECO7
“He even lets you use notes, written on a small notecard, during the exams.”
ECO8
“ . Find someone else.”
ECO7

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections , and high-stakes timed tests with limited live teaching.

Main concern

weight make the online path stressful.

What students said

“The exams are 50 questions and we only have 90 minutes to complete. Once you complete a question and go to the next question it gets locked.”
ECO7
“This teacher does not do lectures and does not offer much help. Get a different teacher.”
ECO35307

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

friendlier in person with notecards, harsher online with timed locked-item tests.

Test HeavyNotecard Allowed In PersonTimed Online ExamsLocked Questions Online

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and align with PowerPoint lectures if you attend.

Notecard AllowedLecture AlignedTrick Questions Possible
“He even lets you use notes, written on a small notecard, during the exams.”
ECO8
“Lets you use a note card on the exams.”
ECON7ECON8

Online

Online exams can be 50 questions in 90 minutes with answered items locked, so review before advancing.

50 Questions90 MinutesLocked NavigationHigh Stakes
“The exams are 50 questions and we only have 90 minutes to complete. Once you complete a question and go to the next question it gets locked.”
ECO7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ignore the bad reviews. I took this class in person and his lectures were amazing. Made everything simple.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting format split between in-person lectures and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“His lectures were amazing. Made everything simple.”

🖥️ Online Risk

30/100

“This teacher does not do lectures and does not offer much help.”

📝

48/100

“The exams are 50 questions and we only have 90 minutes to complete.”

👍 Split Recommendation

42/100

“ . Find someone else.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so well
  • Responded to my emails decently fast
  • WATCH OUT he'll ask "trick questions"

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework and exams
  • you do not need a textbook
  • he is a very difficult professor

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online Format

  • read the , and
  • Once you complete a question and go to the next question it gets locked

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews from 2010-2022 with .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECO75 reviews
ECON72 reviews
ECO33331 review
ECO353071 review
ECO37101 review
Show 2 more courses
ECO81 review
ECON7ECON81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values