AI Rate Professor

Construction

James Thomas

CON66 · CON68 · CON72 · CON63A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

Excellent pick for construction students who want a and will attend class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringEasy to passTest heavyGraded by few thingsAccessible outside class
  • Students call him the best and want him for all required construction classes
  • Low difficulty with easy-to-pass structure if you put in effort
  • and mandatory attendance

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Reviews describe easy-to-pass classes and low difficulty when students put in effort, with A and B grades reported.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Average difficulty is very low and multiple comments call the class easy to pass.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

Only in-person data; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and one wants him for all necessary classes.

Recommendation is unanimous across the four in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Works with students to help them pass if they put in effort; graded by few things.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Light

78/100

Low reported difficulty and graded-by-few-things tags suggest a lighter assignment load outside tests.

Format shift

In-person only; comments do .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students call him the , and accessible outside class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags repeatedly say test heavy and graded by few things with .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All reviews are in person and , and easy difficulty with test-focused grading.

Main concern

Attendance is mandatory and .

What students said

“The .”
CON66
“Very caring and understanding professor. Makes sure you understand the information and works with you to make sure you pass as long as you put in the effort.”
CON68
“Easy class to pass.”
CON63A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or exam format details.

Test heavyGraded by few things

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses are described as test heavy with few graded items; .

Test heavyGraded by few things
“ as other classes.”
CON72
“Easy class to pass.”
CON63A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person construction reviews with medium credibility due to small sample size. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“The .”

❤️ Caring Support

88/100

“Very caring and understanding professor. Makes sure you understand the information and works with you to make sure you pass as long as you put in the effort.”

📈 Easy Course

88/100

“Easy class to pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • I want him for all my necessary classes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class to pass.
  • as other classes.
  • works with you to make sure you pass as long as you put in the effort

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four short in-person reviews from 2021 with strong consistency but limited detail and no online sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CON63A1 review
CON661 review
CON681 review
CON721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values