AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cammie Hsu

MAT35 · MAT36 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a supportive math teacher; online requires more self-direction and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and funny in personSelf-taught online feelLots of homeworkGives good feedbackMixed format experience
  • In-person students praise her as caring, funny, and .
  • Online students report , and a harder path to a good grade.
  • , so format and effort level matter a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

In person a solid B+ felt reachable with support, but the online review ended in a and homework.

Online evidence is much harsher on grades than the lighter in-person path.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty swings hard by format, from tough online self-teaching to a manageable in-person class.

Online rated very hard; in person rated easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Tags and comments stress that skipping hurts, and the .

Both formats signal you cannot safely skip, even .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

.

Recommendation is strong for in person and weak for online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

She is described as nice and understanding, but grades still vary widely with effort and format.

Format shift

+ outcome.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Online tags and comments flag lots of homework, while in person felt less burdensome.

Format shift

Workload complaints concentrate in the online review.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students call her caring, funny, and .

Format shift

Teaching praise is much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize homework load and .

Format shift

Neither .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and student-centered with less struggle and strong willingness to help.

Main concern

Sample is only one review, so results may not generalize.

What students said

“Such a good teacher that cares about her students and listens to them. will do extra to ensure her students do well.”
MAT35

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online felt like self-teaching with , and a rough grade outcome despite a nice professor.

Main concern

and difficulty with .

What students said

“Due to classes being online and everything which sucked.”
MAT36

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews as open book, proctoring, or closed-book rules.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

“You will not struggle too much in her class”
MAT35

Online

Online comments focus on self-teaching and .

“you're pretty much teaching yourself everything which sucked.”
MAT36

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Such a good teacher that cares about her students and listens to them. will do extra to ensure her students do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting format contrast in support and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Caring Support

72/100

“will do extra to ensure her students do well. very funny and has a contagious cheerful spirit!!”

📚

35/100

“you're pretty much teaching yourself everything which sucked.”

👍 Split Recommendation

50/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • cares about her students and listens to them
  • very funny and has a contagious cheerful spirit!!
  • and understanding though.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will not struggle too much in her class
  • Lots of homework
  • teaching yourself everything which sucked

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across different formats and years, with mixed outcomes and limited assessment detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT351 review
MAT361 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values