AI Rate Professor

Electronics

Patrick Maluso

MAN60 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know hydraulics/pneumatics and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSarcasticHeavy ReadingUnclear GradesNot Beginner Friendly
  • Only one review exists, and it and teaching approach.
  • Student reports , and sarcasm.
  • Most classmates reportedly maxed out around a B even with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Reviewer says most students got B even with and calls him a .

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Hydraulics/pneumatics content is framed as hard for beginners with and papers.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

Based solely on the in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The and , and tone.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

; grades stay around B even with and remain vague.

Format shift

Single in-person source only.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and many papers create a substantial workload.

Format shift

Workload details are from the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Student says he is sarcastic and poorly understands beginners new to the systems.

Format shift

Teaching judgment rests on one in-person comment.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Many papers and structure.

Format shift

and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole in-person review describes a hard, expensive, poorly scaffolded systems class with .

Main concern

and weak support for students new to the subject.

What students said

“Very sarcastic. Not a very good understanding that many students have never worked with these systems and completely new to subject.”
MAN60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and heavy paper work.

Tough GradingMany Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam book policy.

Tough GradingMany Papers
“ . Majority of students got a B even by doing .”
MAN60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Majority of students got a B even by doing .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting tough grading and weak beginner support. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Fit

30/100

“Not a very good understanding that many students have never worked with these systems and completely new to subject.”

⚖️

22/100

“ . Majority of students got a B even by doing .”

📚 Workload & Cost

25/100

“Made us buy 2 books for his class.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Majority of students got a B even by doing
  • Doesn't give a definitive answer to what your grade is

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very sarcastic
  • Not a very good understanding that many students have never worked with these systems

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent review exists, so .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAN601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values