AI Rate Professor

English

Emily Robles

ENG1A · ENG1B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her for ENG1A if and can keep up with attendance and writing deadlines.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEssay help and feedbackCaring English profWriting-heavyMandatory attendanceOrganized
  • and support that
  • Workload
  • One low-rated F review is inconsistent and should be weighed carefully

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students can do well with her essay help, but and B-range grades show an A still takes solid writing work.

All evidence is in person; one F review conflicts with its positive comment text.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Writing-heavy college English with moderate difficulty and .

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Four of and ; one outlier F review is hard to trust.

In-person only; 80% take-again baseline matches comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and strong feedback, but .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Not endless homework for ENG1A, but and some LOTS OF HOMEWORK tags on ENG1B.

Format shift

In-person; ENG1B comments mention heavier reading and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students highlight caring support, organization, and making English enjoyable despite subject hate.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on multiple essays with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person English , and ability to make writing class enjoyable.

Main concern

and multi-essay load; one anomalous low review with contradictory text.

What students said

“She helps with essays! she always tries to make english fun for her students.”
ENG1A
“She works with you in your papers and and gives a lot of feedback.”
ENG1A
“There are 4 essays with topics about mental health.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and , so exam risk is not clearly proven.

Essay-focused assessmentWriting workshopsLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; .

Major essaysFeedback-heavy writing
“There are 4 essays with topics about mental health.”
ENG1A
“She works with you in your papers and and gives a lot of feedback.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She works with you in your papers and and gives a lot of feedback.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, emphasizing essay support and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Essay Coaching

78/100

“She helps with essays! she always tries to make english fun for her students.”

❤️ Caring Demeanor

80/100

“Professor Robles is such a sweet professor.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

80/100

“I absolutely hate English but she made the .”

Theme 1

✍️

  • There is not a lot of homework. There are 4 essays
  • gives a lot of feedback

Theme 2

🏫 About Class Atmosphere

  • She made english something to look forward too.
  • I absolutely hate English but she made the .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews with mostly aligned praise, but one contradictory F rating and limited time span keep credibility medium.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A3 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values