AI Rate Professor

English

Patricia Van Osterhoudt

READ81 · ENG1A · ENGLISH60B · REA81 · EGLIS50 · ENGLI1A · ENGLISH · ENG60B · ENG50 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid if you can; only consider if you thrive under strict attendance, constant participation, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderMandatory attendanceParticipation mattersAttitude issuesLots of homework
  • and forced participation dominate student complaints
  • Attendance and bathroom rules are strict and punitive

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and low reported grades make an A a steep climb.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Heavy homework, strict participation, and and process burden.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and early exits marked absent.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most vocal reviews urge students , and stress despite a few older positives.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and participation can tank the grade.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and constant in-class participation keep the load high.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some say she teaches or organizes work well, but many call her unhelpful, sarcastic, and discouraging.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays, homework, lab hours, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English/reading classes feel strict, high-pressure on participation, and often demoralizing despite some older positive notes.

Main concern

, and a rude or sarcastic classroom tone.

What students said

“ .”
ENG1A
“The .”
REA81
“HORRIBLE teacher, this teacher is not understanding at all she is very sarcastic and rude.”
READ81

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on papers and participation more than formal proctored exams; friendliness is low due to harsh standards.

Paper-heavy gradingParticipation gradingLimited revisions

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation over explicit exam-proctoring policies.

Paper-heavy gradingParticipation grading
“I received and F on the paper because how she grades.”
REA81
“I wish she and turn them in again for .”
ENGLI1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person English/reading reviews , and tone. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

📝

22/100

“The .”

📅

12/100

“ !”

😠 Classroom Tone

25/100

“she is very sarcastic and rude.”

Theme 1

📝

  • Even if you go to tutoring she'll say its wrong.
  • I received and F on the paper because how she grades.

Theme 2

📅

  • if you leave the class 5 minutes before it is over she marks you absent
  • She doesnt allow bathroom breaks
  • If you're 10 minutes late, she WILL MARK YOU ABSENT

Theme 3

❤️ About Character & Tone

  • She is a horrible person.
  • She's ALWAYS in a bad mood.
  • she has an attitude problem

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen in-person reviews spanning 2008-2019 give a long, mostly consistent picture of strict rules and .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG60B3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENGLI1A2 reviews
REA812 reviews
EGLIS501 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG501 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH60B1 review
READ811 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1