AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

John Gill

RLST189 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Only pick him if you want a light grade with low structure; do not expect a rigorous learning experience.

Best fit · Easy A HunterLoose structureEasy ALittle concrete learningWould not retakeAccessible outside class
  • interesting topic but very loose with .
  • Student got an A yet felt little concrete learning.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Few assignments and an A grade suggest low effort for a high mark.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Difficulty rated low and the student describes minimal concrete work.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

review.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and felt little real learning.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Student earned an A with .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Featherlight

88/100

Review stresses super loose structure and not very many assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Topic was interesting but teaching felt unstructured and not concrete.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize few .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Single in-person review describes a loose, low-assignment hip-hop religion class that felt interesting but not substantive.

Main concern

Student felt they learned little concrete content and .

What students said

“It was interesting but super loose and . I feel like I didn't really learn anything concrete.”
RLST189

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It was interesting but super loose and . I feel like I didn't really learn anything concrete. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I feel like I didn't really learn anything concrete.”

👎 Recommendation

25/100

“ ”

🪶 Workload

88/100

“super loose and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It was interesting but super loose
  • I feel like I didn't really learn anything concrete

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2019 review with limited detail makes confidence low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RLST1891 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values