AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Angela Calloway

EAR20 · EAR38715 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

, but expect possible disorganization and verify structure before enrolling.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringUnorganizedGroup ProjectsMixed ReviewsKind Personality
  • Recent students call her kind, caring, and easy if you follow directions.
  • Older reviews criticize poor organization and incomplete curriculum.
  • Workload and difficulty swing widely between formats and years.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Recent comments say and easy A-level outcomes, though older classes felt stressful.

Online ; older in-person reviews were harder and more stressful.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Recent ratings mark difficulty as very low, while and hard.

Online and ; one 2019 in-person review found it stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Some sections list attendance not mandatory, while .

Online and ; another in-person section required it.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but older students strongly advise against her as a professor.

Recent online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Recent students report full points for following directions and .

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in the online review; older in-person feedback focuses more on organization than grades.

Workload

Light

68/100

Recent difficulty ratings are low; group projects appear, but workload is not described as heavy overall.

Format shift

Online course felt light; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students call her caring and inspirational, but , and .

Format shift

Recent reviews are much .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and and projects over tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and amazing to unprepared, stressful, and unfinished curriculum.

Main concern

Organization and preparedness vary sharply by semester.

What students said

“she's amazing”
EAR38715
“ .”
EAR20
“ , and the class only got thru half of the curriculum.”
EAR38715

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online review praises a kind, easy course where .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Just follow directions, and .”
EAR20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears driven by assignments and projects.

Assignment FocusedGroup Projects

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize assignments and details.

Group ProjectsAssignment Focused
“ and ends up not having them.”
EAR20

Online

Online review focuses on following assignment directions for ; .

Assignment Focused
“Just follow directions, and .”
EAR20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a great person, but as a professor, it's a big no.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting kindness versus organization issues. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , and the class only got thru half of the curriculum.”

❤️ Caring Presence

80/100

“Overral she is a very kind and understanding professor.”

📋 Organization Risk

35/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's amazing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just follow directions, and
  • class full of stress

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • kind and understanding
  • great person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews across 2015-2026 with mixed eras and limited detail, so confidence stays low.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EAR202 reviews
EAR387152 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1