AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Gilbert Marquez

GAM32 · GAM31 · CIS38 · CIS78 · CIS79A · CIS78A · CIS34 · CIS35 · CISMAYA · CIS38A · ADOBESECT · CIS122 · CISCIS · CISLIBR · CIS124 · CIS37 · CIS45 · GAM38A · CIS39 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Great for learning Photoshop, Maya, and game art basics, but check the recent art-theft allegation before committing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyIndustry-Experienced ArtistHands-On Photoshop/3D MentorEasy A PotentialWaitlist FavoriteIntegrity Red Flag
  • Historically praised as a top game-art and Photoshop instructor with real industry insight.
  • Workload and grades are generally manageable if you show up and .
  • A recent review alleges student art was posted as his own, which is a serious trust concern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Multiple students call it an easy A if you complete the , and reported difficulty is low.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Intro software and , though pace can overwhelm complete beginners.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

and participation matters, but several reviews treat it as flexible.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and game skills, but skipping class and the theft claim pull the overall recommendation down.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Fair if you follow instructions and finish work; harsh if you ignore directions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

and textbooks are often not required.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students repeatedly call him the and game design teacher, with and industry context.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and game design, with mostly glowing praise tempered by skip-class frustration and a serious integrity claim.

Main concern

Possible misuse of student artwork and occasional skipped lectures.

What students said

“ .”
GAM31
“Also an easy A”
CIS35
“He has taken art from me and other artists from his classes and posted them onto his portfolio as his own work.”
GAM32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize project work and participation more than formal proctored exams.

Project-Based AssessmentParticipation Matters

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on art and .

Project-Based AssessmentParticipation Matters
“As long as you do your work and how he asked, you should be on his good side”
GAM38A
“Also an easy A”
CIS35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If there is a choice between any teacher and . hands down.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, , and one integrity red flag. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Gil is the class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ !”

📈 Easy Grades

84/100

“Also an easy A”

⚠️ Integrity Concern

15/100

“He has taken art from me and other artists from his classes and posted them onto his portfolio as his own work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely helpful and made class fun
  • His fresh way of teaching is refreshing
  • Teaching from the heart, Gil will guide you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Also an easy A
  • Very hands on, gives plenty of time to do work
  • Hard, but very fair

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • funny guy, gives great help
  • and easy to talk to
  • He's how a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

29 reviews spanning many years with consistent praise, though most are older and one recent integrity claim is an outlier.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS78A5 reviews
CIS38A3 reviews
CIS393 reviews
GAM312 reviews
GAM322 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ADOBESECT1 review
CIS1221 review
CIS1241 review
CIS341 review
CIS351 review
CIS371 review
CIS381 review
CIS451 review
CIS781 review
CIS79A1 review
CISCIS1 review
CISLIBR1 review
CISMAYA1 review
GAM38A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values