AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Kamal Sadatmand

MAT35 · MAT63 · MATMAT · MATH52 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an easy pass and are ready to learn entirely on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTeach YourselfUnclear LecturesEasy TestsOften LateDrops Bad Grades
  • Students repeatedly say they must teach themselves because .
  • Classwork can be easy and dropped grades.
  • if you actually want to learn the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and students passing with partial work make high marks available despite poor teaching.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content and if you already know the material, but .

All difficulty comments are in person; no online sample exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

62/100

, though some short-semester classes still require presence to sign homework.

and are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students refuse to take him again and urge others and wasted class time.

; all reviews are in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

84/100

, and passes students who turn in little work.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is entirely in person.

Workload

Light

72/100

and often not collected; class time is frequently used for .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students cannot understand lectures, call him absent-minded, and say YouTube teaches better than he does.

Format shift

; one old outlier is positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

A while but often not graded.

Format shift

Assessment pattern is described only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students describe unclear lectures, frequent lateness, self-teaching, and .

Main concern

You may pass without learning, which hurts readiness for later math.

What students said

“Pretty much awful. Be ready to learn on your own because .”
MATH52
“You pretty much have to teach yourself in this class.”
MAT35
“Easy class. but doesnt collect it or put it in the gradebook.”
MATH52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and easy if you already know the material.

Multiple ChoiceShort TestsEasy If Prepared

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

call easy if prepared, with frequent typos noted.

Multiple ChoiceShort TestsEasy If Prepared
“ and are multiple guess (and frequently have typos).”
MAT35
“Just 3 or 4 tests fairly easy if you know what you are doing.”
MATH52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pretty much awful. Be ready to learn on your own because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Can never understand what he is trying to convey to the students.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ !!!!”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“I PASSED HIS CLASS AND ONLY TURNED IN HALF OF THE WORK.”

⏰ Classroom Time Use

25/100

“he only spends about 1 hour of a 3 hour class lecturing, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Be ready to learn on your own because .
  • I can never understand what this guy is trying to say.
  • Better to just watch youtube videos of other prof. teaching you the problems.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class. but doesnt collect it
  • and goes extremely easy on the class.
  • IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR DOING

Theme 3

⏰ About Class Logistics

  • Always late.
  • . .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

poor teaching and easy grading, though grades reported are sparse and a few comments are very old.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH524 reviews
MAT353 reviews
MAT631 review
MATMAT1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1