AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jason Parks

MAT5 · MATH64 · MATH35 · MAT52 · MATH10 · MATH52 · MATH1A · MAT12 · MATHM63 · MATH1 · ALGEB8586 · MAT1B · STATS · MATH12HYBRID · 1A1B · MAT36 · MAT1A · MAT10 · MATH12 · MATH3774 · MATHSECT · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Only consider him in person if you can stay on top of homework and self-study; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing LecturerTough GraderPoor Email ResponseHilarious but InconsistentHeavy Homework
  • and funny, others say he is arrogant, fast, and unhelpful.
  • Online and hybrid sections draw strong complaints about ignored emails and .
  • Grading is often described as tough with little or , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Many report tough grading, no curve, few total points, and that test average.

Online evidence stresses lack of feedback that hurts grades; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Content ranges from easier lower-level math to challenging calculus and stats with a fast lecture pace for many students.

Difficulty complaints appear in both formats, but online pain is more about support than concept depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tag skip-class-and-fail style expectations, especially for quizzes and lectures.

; online notes hybrid presence without strong flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

, and recent comments heavily warn against online sections and .

A minority of ; online students almost never do.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Common themes are tough grader, no curve, grade-by-percentage surprises, and limited .

Format shift

Strict grading shows up mainly in person; online .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and staying current is repeatedly described as required to survive.

Format shift

; online students also report unanswered questions on assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Some students find him clear, funny, and passionate; .

Format shift

; online teaching quality is widely panned.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a weighted final rather than one single type.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes and tests; online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise clear examples, humor, and passion, while others call him rude, late, and a .

Main concern

, and inconsistent communication can tank grades even when lectures are decent.

What students said

“ , and funny.”
MAT1B
“ ”
MAT12
“He's a jerk, he's arrogant, absent minded, doesn't respond to emails and .”
MATH12

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report very slow or , and frustration with hybrid follow-up after class.

Main concern

Near-zero responsiveness and regret.

What students said

“I emailed him 8 times about the same thing no response.”
MAT12
“ .”
MAT12
“Parks? who is he? I wouldn't know because ”
MAT12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard math assessments that many call fair if , though finals and .

Weekly QuizzesStudy Guide Alignment SometimesHard FinalsGroup QuizzesCalculator-Based Work

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are frequent; some say tests match and uncurved.

Weekly QuizzesHard FinalsGroup QuizzesStudy Guide Similar Tests
“ and straightforward. .”
MAT1A
“ so hard and he actually thinks its easier than the regular tests.”
MATH10

Online

Online reviews do not clearly document proctoring tools; the tests.

Limited Feedback Before Tests
“I know I could've had a better grade in this class if .”
MAT12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took his online stats class and it was HORRIBLE. and he can't convey his teaching very well online.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (5 online, 45 in , and online support failures. Credibility rating: High.

📧 Online Support Gap

22/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

54/100

“ , and funny.”

⚖️

30/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ if you can. He's very knowledgeable and knows how to teach but makes things unnecessarily difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and the hw is straight forward.
  • He moves very quickly through lecture so make sure to pay attention
  • Cool guy but bad teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're looking for an easy A, look elsewhere.
  • As long as you do the .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Access

  • I emailed him 8 times about the same thing no response.
  • ... after a month!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years with detailed comments and a reliable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 57
3 out of 59
2 out of 59
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH528 reviews
MAT127 reviews
MAT1A5 reviews
MATH104 reviews
MAT523 reviews
Show 16 more courses
MATH123 reviews
MATH1A3 reviews
MAT102 reviews
MAT1B2 reviews
MAT52 reviews
1A1B1 review
ALGEB85861 review
MAT361 review
MATH11 review
MATH12HYBRID1 review
MATH351 review
MATH37741 review
MATH641 review
MATHM631 review
MATHSECT1 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1