AI Rate Professor

English

Scott Russell

ENG1A · ENG1B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and accept mixed preparation and availability.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized reviewsEssay-focusedUnclear prompts riskHelpful when engagedHard to reach
  • One review calls him unprepared with ; an older review praises informative classes and feedback.
  • .
  • and office access can be limited across campuses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Grades and difficulty look moderate, but inconsistently hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Described as informative and challenging but not especially difficult overall.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Strong praise for unprepared teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; one reported C with mixed teaching quality.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Paper-centered course with homework and classwork less important than essays.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

and run informative classes, but may arrive unprepared and distracted.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Class is mostly paper-based; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English experience splits between a distracted unprepared semester and an .

Main concern

and uneven preparation can hurt learning if you need structure.

What students said

“He would come to classes unprepared. .”
ENG1B
“Russell was always willing to work with students and , but could be hard to get a hold of.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and .

Paper-based assessmentEssay prompts

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay prompts; reviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring style.

EssaysPapers
“Class is mostly paper based, with .”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you wish to learn something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2015, highlighting polarized teaching quality. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Prep Risk

45/100

“He would come to classes unprepared. .”

📝 Paper Heavy

28/100

“Class is mostly paper based, with .”

🤝

55/100

“Russell was always willing to work with students and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He seemed distracted by something going on in his life the whole semester.
  • Class was informative and challenging, but not especially difficult.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • could be hard to get a hold of, due to activity at multiple campuses.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

and limited grade detail reduce reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values