AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Carlos Naranjo

CHE2A · CHEM2ALAB · CHEM2A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid this professor if you can; expect and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInconsistent GradingCannot TeachUnfair Lab Partner ScoringDisrespectfulAvoid If Possible
  • Students consistently say he cannot teach and .
  • very differently.
  • Nearly every if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students still earn A or B, but and identical work is scored unequally.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call the course much harder than expected, with high difficulty ratings and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Almost every comment ends with and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report shifting criteria and very different scores for the same submitted lab work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Labs themselves can be doable if , but overall course experience still feels tough.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say he knows content but , and belittles questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as confusing, inconsistent, and unfair, with partners graded differently for the same work.

Main concern

Inconsistent grading and .

What students said

“He's so confusing. .”
CHE2A
“ . I can see he knew the material but he can not teach!”
CHEM2A
“He will give and the other will get marked down even though the work is identical.”
CHEM2ALAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy; .

“ .”
CHEM2A
“ and grading.”
CHEM2ALAB

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF YOU CAN!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“I can see he knew the material but he can not teach!”

⚖️

18/100

“My partner and I submitted the same work but our scores were always significantly different.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ IF YOU CAN!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's so confusing.
  • he can not teach!
  • provided .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • My lab partner got a 20100, and I got a 98100.

Theme 3

💔 About Respect & Tone

  • the most disrespectful professor I've ever had.
  • being told "it's hard to ask smart questions"
  • Unwilling to listen or answer questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed, highly consistent negative reviews from 2014-2015 support a , but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM2A3 reviews
CHE2A1 review
CHEM2ALAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1