AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Judy Jorgensen

AREHIST36 · ARE37 · ARCHITECTURE · DESIGN · ACH37 · ARE35 · ARE36 · ARC37 · RMOD01 · ARC36 · ARE1 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her design classes if you want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStudent SupportivePushes Best WorkFlexible DeadlinesDesign MentorGoes Extra Mile
  • Most students call her amazing for design and architecture courses.
  • , and with letters of support.
  • A few older online-format experiences report weak email response and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades feel fair with extensions and feedback, but and participation mean you still need steady effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is approachable with and require real design work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and participation as essential to success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students love her design classes and would go out of .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and deadline flexibility when she sees progress.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

There are a lot of assignments and projects, but students say the workload pays off in learning.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Widely praised as , and willing to go far beyond class hours.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Projects, design process, and class work dominate; exams are barely mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Strong in-person design teaching with , and students repeatedly saying .

Main concern

Attendance and keeping up with ; missing orientation or class hurts.

What students said

“Very student supportive and great teacher”
ARC36
“I love her!! You may not understand the , but by the end she has managed .”
ARE36
“AWESOME TEACHER!! She pushes you to learn, but you really don't want to miss a class”
ARE36

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on design projects and .

Project-BasedDesign ProcessDeadline Flexibility

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize projects and design process rather than formal exams.

Project-BasedDesign Process
“AMAZING - if you want to express yourself in design this course is a must”
ARC36
“The - if you ask her a question she will respond by asking you three or four.”
DESIGN

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I love her!! You may not understand the , but by the end she has managed .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting mentoring strength and project-based learning. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

90/100

“AMAZING - if you want to express yourself in design this course is a must”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“Flexible and and will go out of the way to make sure you do.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“I LOVE this teacher!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • YOU WILL LEARN IN THIS CLASS!
  • makes it relevent and uses the real world examples
  • She will not give you the answer - she makes you think

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • extends deadlines as long as she sees that you are progressing
  • Keep up with the but you learn more than you expect.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very student supportive and great teacher
  • goes out of her way to let you be successful.
  • She's an understanding and sweet person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning many years show strong consistency on support and teaching quality, with only a few older negative outliers.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARC363 reviews
ARE363 reviews
ARE352 reviews
ACH371 review
ARC371 review
Show 6 more courses
ARCHITECTURE1 review
ARE11 review
ARE371 review
AREHIST361 review
DESIGN1 review
RMOD011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values