AI Rate Professor

Spanish

Rosa Charcas

SPA1 · SPAN1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid Rosa Charcas; , and no support when students need it.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInadequate TeachingHarsh GraderUnwilling to HelpAuto C CultureDo Not Take
  • Students say and unsupported.
  • Grading felt punitive, including a near-90% score turned into a B.
  • Zero flexibility shown for serious illness before a midterm.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Near-perfect work still became a B, and students report auto C grades for non-native speakers.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students , and little usable instruction for non-native speakers.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, but zero flexibility was shown for a hospital stay before the midterm.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Both students and cite ruined grades plus zero support.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report auto C grades and a 89.93 percent becoming a B with no study guide for the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse beyond oral and written finals and a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews call instruction inadequate, say she only engages native speakers, and leave the .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Comments center on midterm, oral exam, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Spanish 1 reviews paint an inadequate, inflexible instructor who confuses non-native speakers and .

Main concern

and refusal to work with students in crisis can tank GPAs.

What students said

“Teacher was inadequate at teaching. Ruined my 4.0 gpa.”
SPA1
“She is unwilling to work with anyone.”
SPAN1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Finals and midterms feel high-stakes with no study guide for the and .

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and written components with and no written-final study guide.

Oral ExamWritten FinalNo Makeup MidtermNo Study Guide
“Didn't write her final, no study guide besides the oral exam, recieved 89.93% and got a B.”
SPA1
“I am giving the , if you cannot be there I'm sorry.”
SPAN1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher was inadequate at teaching. Ruined my 4.0 gpa. Only talked to native speakers, rest of the and given "auto" "c's".”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2013-2014, highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Teacher was inadequate at teaching. Ruined my 4.0 gpa.”

🧱 Zero Flexibility

12/100

“She is unwilling to work with anyone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher was inadequate at teaching.
  • Only talked to native speakers, rest of the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • recieved 89.93% and got a B.
  • Ruined my 4.0 gpa.

Theme 3

🧱 About Flexibility

  • She is unwilling to work with anyone.
  • if you cannot be there I'm sorry.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews from 2013-2014 with , but both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SPA11 review
SPAN11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values