AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paul Rodriguez

MATHMATH · MATH64 · A52 · MAT52 · MATH63 · MATH52 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and will do the homework; skip if you hate heavy problem sets or off-color jokes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCrystal clear explanationsHeavy homework loadCorny jokesPassionate helperAttendance required
  • and real willingness to help struggling math learners.
  • lots of and show-up-to-class expectations.
  • A minority report rushed pacing, sarcasm, and unprofessional jokes that turn them off.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if you show up, finish the , and treat homework as .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content difficulty is moderate for community-college math, and many say he makes concepts easy to grasp when you keep pace.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and success depends on showing up every class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most reviews strongly recommend him for clarity and help, with a small but vocal set of .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and tests fairly; , but help-focused rather than trick-oriented.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

as huge problem sets every class.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and excellent at explaining; minority find him rushed or discouraging.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

and said to match tests; attendance and tests also matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and homework-heavy practice dominate; most find him supportive if they keep up.

Main concern

and occasional rushed or unprofessional classroom banter.

What students said

“Really good teacher! Took him for 64 and 52. He makes math easy and is willing to help.”
MATH52
“Difficult class, but a great teacher. This is the 2nd class I've taken that he taught.”
MAT52
“he expects Way to much h.w ! he would give 150 Problems every class!!”
MATHMATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctored policies; tests appear standard and .

Homework-aligned testsIn-person class

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice-based; no explicit proctoring or open-book claims.

Homework-aligned tests
“He does give a good amount of homework but it directly correlates with the tests.”
MATH52
“Show up to and will do well.”
MATH64

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can. He makes math easy and is willing to help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews (2009-2014), highlighting teaching clarity, homework intensity, and split tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

78/100

“ and easy to understand.”

📚

32/100

“he expects Way to much h.w ! he would give 150 Problems every class!!”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and you can really relate to him
  • He is passionate about helping his students enjoy math
  • occasional jokes and thier funny. hes great at teaching though

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Difficult class, but a great teacher
  • Show up to and will do well
  • Lots of and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Tone

  • He makes stupid sexual jokes throughout his classes
  • all he talks about is his stupid beer
  • If you failed a as

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen detailed in-person reviews span 2009-2014 with a , but they are older and .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH526 reviews
MAT523 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
A521 review
MATH631 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values