AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Wendy Goliff

CHE2A · CHEM2A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you need a risk of confusion and poor grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesCannot answer questionsHard chemistryHomework criticalLow support
  • Two of three reviews call her the ; class-wide confusion and failing reported.
  • Students say she often could not answer questions and taught material not aligned with the book.
  • and if you listen carefully.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Hard work alone did not save many students; reports of whole-class failing and a D+ grade appear.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Material is hard, misaligned with the book for some, and leaves the .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

; one student stressed not missing class and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Majority urge against her for inability to teach or answer questions despite one positive review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Reported class-wide failing and a D+ despite hard work; little evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Heavy study and ; students who worked hard still struggled with confusion.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Dominant theme is inability to answer questions and leave the whole class confused; one minority positive.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize homework and finals but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , but majority report confusion and unanswered questions all semester.

Main concern

Instructor often cannot answer questions; class described as confused and failing.

What students said

“she was the ... every question we had she didnt know”
CHEM2A
“ class was failing the entire semester”
CHEM2A
“She basically read the entire book for us and .”
CHE2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention studying for finals and homework importance but .

Finals mentionedHomework critical

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; format details beyond study and homework are not clearly proven.

FinalsHomework critical
“i worked so hard and .”
CHEM2A
“The most important thing to do in the class was to do the homework!”
CHE2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ class was failing the entire semester and when we asked her questions half the time she said she didn't know.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting confusion and weak Q&A support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“she was the ... every question we had she didnt know”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ class was failing the entire semester”

📚

55/100

“The most important thing to do in the class was to do the homework!”

❓ Unanswered Questions

20/100

“when we asked her questions half the time she said she didn't know.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She basically read the entire book for us and .
  • Didnt teach from the book which was difficult. taught alot that wasnt in the book.
  • the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the entire class was failing the entire semester
  • i worked so hard and .
  • The most important thing to do in the class was to do the homework!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

2013; highly negative consensus but small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM2A2 reviews
CHE2A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values