AI Rate Professor

History

G Florenza

HISTORY6 · HISTORY67 · HISTORY · HIST6 · HISTFALL · HISTORY7 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you already love history and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard testsTough graderLecture heavyKnows historyAvoid if GPA-focused
  • Subject expertise is acknowledged, but many call him a poor teacher who talks fast and is .
  • Grades hang on a .
  • Would-take-again is effectively zero among those who answered, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

and even strong studiers often miss an A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Heavy memorization, fast lectures, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and notes from class are essential for tests.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Many urge avoidance for and weak teaching, with 0% would-take-again where reported.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and little cushion.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

and memorization for detailed tests; some older reviews mention fewer essays.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Knows history but as a teacher.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

; little assignment weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews split between respect for his knowledge and , and weak teaching clarity.

Main concern

and high drop rates make the course risky for GPA.

What students said

“ !! this professor is a smart man but is a terrible teacher.”
HIST6
“ . If you want to pass, then attendance/note taking/ . And even then, you are not guaranteed an A.”
HIST6
“Very difficult class. Tons of information to memorize. Very . TESTS SUCK!!”
HISTORY7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, very hard, and often more detailed than lectures or study guides.

Extremely hard testsFew high-stakes examsDetailed beyond lecturesStudy guide incomplete

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely hard with .

Extremely hard testsFew high-stakes examsDetailed beyond lectures
“ . the only thing he writes on board is topics and talks on them from there.”
HIST6
“Very . TESTS SUCK!!”
HISTORY7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! this professor is a smart man but is a terrible teacher. He talks very vast and doesn't repeat himself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and split teaching views. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Concerns

28/100

“He's obviously not dumb, but he shouldnt be a teacher.”

📝

22/100

“ . If you want to pass, then attendance/note taking/ . And even then, you are not guaranteed an A.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ . (Half the class dropped by the end of the term)”

📚 Subject Expertise

70/100

“This man knows his history.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks very vast and doesn't repeat himself.
  • he's very boring..not an interesting teacher at all.
  • very unhelpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grade is based off of 2 exams and the final.
  • smart guy but very difficult, especially the tests.
  • TESTS SUCK!!

Theme 3

⚠️

  • !!
  • .
  • you will want to drop his class the first week you're enrolled

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen mixed reviews from 2004-2017 with , but some older outliers and limited grade data.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HIST65 reviews
HISTORY73 reviews
HISTORY62 reviews
HISTFALL1 review
HISTORY1 review
Show 1 more courses
HISTORY671 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1