AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Andrew Smith

ACC1B · ACCT1B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate poor communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationBook-only lecturesExtra feesLate grade postsHard accounting
  • and almost no class communication.
  • Teaching often means reading the book with .
  • Hidden access-code fees and and frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Accounting is called hard and boring; passing needs the , and .

; no official online review count.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Subject is hard, lectures add little beyond the book, and several students left with almost no new knowledge.

; no official online review count.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One positive review says not missing class is key to passing; .

; no official online review count.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Four of six reviews strongly warn against taking him over communication, fees, and weak teaching.

; no official online review count.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Little direct grade-leniency talk; late score posting and hard material make outcomes feel opaque.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-tagged reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and re-taking risk add up; one student dropped after heavy extra fees.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A few like book repetition and help before class, but most .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-tagged reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Homework and quizzes dominate with delayed score posting; .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person-tagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most in-person-tagged reviews describe book-based teaching, delayed responses, and extra fees; a minority praise repetition and availability.

Main concern

, and grades posted only at the end.

What students said

“Horrible Communication.. Mr. and when ”
ACC1B
“no common sense of the subject explained in class”
ACCT1B
“he would not post the majority of your scores until the last two days of the semester”
ACCT1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; learning and feedback.

Book-based learningQuizzesDelayed score posts

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and book-driven work but do not clearly prove exam proctoring rules.

Book-based quizzesLate grade posts
“ days of class”
ACC1B
“if you buy the book, don't miss class and do the ”
ACCT1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person-tagged reviews, highlighting communication and teaching gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“not a very good teacher. It is hard to understand a subject by a book, mainly accounting”

📧 Communication Fail

20/100

“Horrible Communication.. Mr. ”

💸 Extra Costs

25/100

“Mr. Smith added on additional access codes that ran close to $100”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures from the book and uses repetition
  • no common sense of the subject explained in class
  • his way of teaching is very interesting

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Accting is hard & boring
  • scores until the last two days of the semester

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication & Fees

  • Unnecessary fees for class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six older reviews show a , but sample size and age limit certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACC1B3 reviews
ACCT1B3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values