AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

W Clark

MATH1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the only review calls the teaching unfocused and ineffective.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid At All CostsOff-Topic LecturesNo PedagogyPresumptuousEarly Dismissal
  • Single review is extremely negative on teaching quality.
  • Lectures allegedly wander into pet and Africa talk instead of calculus.
  • Student urges complete avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Difficulty is rated 5 with no support for ; the review frames the class as a disaster.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Rated maximum difficulty with lectures that barely cover calculus effectively.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance policy is not stated; early .

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only .

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; the review frames the overall experience as something to flee.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Light

70/100

Student notes you can go home early, implying low productive class demand rather than heavy work.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as presumptuous with no real pedagogy and lectures dominated by off-topic talk.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, so assessment balance remains unclear.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One harsh in-person review says lectures are mostly off-topic talk with little real calculus teaching.

Main concern

Presumptuous style and weak pedagogy with almost no useful instruction.

What students said

“ ! He has no idea what pedagogy or didactics is about.”
MATH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, so format is unproven.

“pet talk, Africa talk, some calculus and more pet talk.”
MATH1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He has no idea what pedagogy or didactics is about.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review from 2006, highlighting total avoidance and weak lecture focus. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“ !”

📚 Weak Teaching Method

12/100

“He has no idea what pedagogy or didactics is about.”

🗣️ Off-Topic Lectures

15/100

“pet talk, Africa talk, some calculus and more pet talk”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • no idea what pedagogy or didactics is about
  • pet talk, Africa talk, some calculus and more pet talk
  • presumptuous individual

Theme 2

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !
  • if you want to indulge yourself by going home early, this is your maistro

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old 2006 review exists, so confidence is low despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values