AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Benjamin Edwards

MAT12 · MAT11 · MATH35 · MAT35 · MATH000 · STATS12 · MAT52 · MAT50 · MATH12 · MATH36 · MATH11 · STATISTICS · MATH50 · MATH52 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Run away; teach yourself from the book if you somehow cannot switch professors.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWorst TeacherRude and UnhelpfulPowerPoint OnlyPicky GraderDoes Not Teach
  • Nearly every review calls him the and
  • Lectures are mostly reading error-filled PowerPoints with
  • and unforgiving while help is refused or belittling

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tests are often hard and , so an A and luck.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content can be manageable from the book, but and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

At least one review says and and quizzes.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Overwhelming and call him the .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and little mercy on late work.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Often worksheets and , but and feel brutal.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Repeatedly described as reading PowerPoints, refusing help, belittling students, and hating the job.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades are driven by quizzes and tests; .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats sections are widely described as hostile, unhelpful, and poorly taught with high failure and .

Main concern

Rude delivery, refusal to help, and .

What students said

“ ”
MATH35
“ . I do not understand why he is still teaching.”
MATH12
“ .”
MAT12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and are frequently called hard and picky.

Hard TestsPicky GradingFew Tests Cover Many ChaptersGroup Final Rarely

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests with picky marking; one stats section had a .

Hard TestsPicky GradingWorksheetsGroup Final
“There are only like 3-4 tests (apart from the final) in the semester which cover like 5 chapters, very picky when .”
MAT35
“ ”
STATS12
“ and gives hw like crazy”
MATH12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF YOU VALUE YOUR EDUCATION”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 in-person reviews, highlighting near-universal avoid warnings on teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

10/100

“ ”

👨‍🏫 Does Not Teach

12/100

“He does not teach, just reads off the PowerPoint which contain many errors.”

😤 Rude and Unhelpful

15/100

“He was very rude, always late, and unwilling to help students.”

⚖️

22/100

“very picky when . Many students fail/drop the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just reads off the PowerPoint which contain many errors
  • skips chapters and has no idea how to teach
  • Might as well teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • very picky when

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • He is very rude,sarcastic and has no people skills
  • Makes students feel like crap
  • He belittles you

Theme 4

🚨 Recommendation Warnings

  • !!
  • STAY AWAY.
  • EPIC FAILLLLLL of a teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

39 consistently negative in-person reviews spanning years with detailed complaints about teaching and grading.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 512
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH119 reviews
MAT127 reviews
MAT354 reviews
MATH524 reviews
MAT523 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH123 reviews
MATH352 reviews
MAT111 review
MAT501 review
MATH0001 review
MATH361 review
MATH501 review
STATISTICS1 review
STATS121 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values