AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael C. Romero

HUM10 · WORLDRELI · PHISECT · HUM11 · PHI10 · PHILOSOPHYRELI · HIS6 · HUM101 · PHILO6 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.1

The decision

if you need a low-effort GE credit and do not care about learning the material.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ANo TestsLets Out EarlyNice But TimidMinimal Teaching
  • Consistently described as an easy A with few or no tests and light essays.
  • and class often ends early.
  • Students who want real learning about religions or philosophy report little depth.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Nearly every review calls it an easy A with , and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Content stays surface-level with film notes and basics rather than deep analysis.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

Multiple students and regularly lets class out early.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but often discouraged if you actually want to learn.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Grades hinge on a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

93/100

, and two short comparison papers at most.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students call him nice and funny but also shy, unprepared, and light on real teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is mostly a few papers or in-class notes with little or no testing.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person World Religions and Philosophy sections are widely called easy A with , and frequent early dismissals, but many say he barely teaches.

Main concern

You will not learn much and lectures can feel boring or unprepared.

What students said

“Easiest A! We never took a test.”
HUM11
“ if you really want to learn something. Its an easy A, .”
HUM10
“Very easy yet very boring. essays.”
HUM10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe few or no tests and .

No FinalNo TestsPaper-Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report no tests or finals and .

No FinalNo TestsEasy Papers
“We never took a test.”
HUM11
“ essays.”
HUM10
“1 PwrPnt, 2 Papers, no Final”
WORLDRELI

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you really want to learn something. Its an easy A, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2011, highlighting easy A access versus shallow teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy A Magnet

94/100

“Easiest A! We never took a test.”

📚 Low Learning Depth

35/100

“ if you really want to learn something.”

😊 Nice Personality

70/100

“He is an extremely nice and enjoyable professor.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easiest A! We never took a test.
  • if you want an A.
  • Easy A.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • if you really want to learn something.
  • This teacher is really boring and doesn't seem to know the material.
  • He seems very shy and intimidated by the students.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He's a nice guy.
  • He is an extremely nice and enjoyable professor.
  • You'll never meet a more understanding teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen older in-person reviews (2006-2011) are and weak teaching depth.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 57
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUM109 reviews
PHI102 reviews
HIS61 review
HUM1011 review
HUM111 review
Show 4 more courses
PHILO61 review
PHILOSOPHYRELI1 review
PHISECT1 review
WORLDRELI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values