AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Khosrow Daraei

CIS72 · FLASH54A · CIS12 · CIS72A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself the software; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOutdated curriculumHard to understandDisorganized lecturesOpen-book testsFly-by-night prep
  • Multiple students say content is years out of date for web and Flash courses.
  • Accent, fast speech, and unprepared lessons make lectures .
  • Work can be easy or ungraded, but learning value is widely questioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Open-book tests and grade possible if you just turn work in.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is treated as easy when work is done, but chaos and outdated topics still confuse students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews ; one note that he has skipped class himself.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Three of five reviews call him among the worst and say he lacks subject knowledge.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Open-book tests and uncollected error-filled assignments suggest grades are not tightly policed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments exist but quality is low and sometimes never checked, so real load varies.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students cite outdated books, unanswered questions, and lessons made up on the fly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of made-up assignments and book-based or open-book tests with weak follow-through.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CIS and web classes described as chaotic, outdated, and poorly explained, with .

Main concern

You may pass without learning current tools or getting real answers to questions.

What students said

“Absolutely no knowledge of his subject.”
CIS72A
“he gave and does .”
CIS12
“HES TEACHING WEB DESIGN AND HAS NEVER HEARD OF DREAMWEAVER!!!”
CIS72

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

At least one course used open-book tests he rarely wanted to give, with little strict proctoring described.

Open book testsTests from the bookLow testing frequency

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; no Lockdown Browser or camera proctoring is described.

Open book testsTests from the bookLow testing frequency
“he gave and does .”
CIS12
“ .”
CIS12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting outdated content and weak instruction. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He has no idea what he is talking about half of the time.”

📚 Outdated Material

20/100

“He teaches on an 11 year old HTML book, does little to no effort to follow the book anyway.”

📗

76/100

“He is really easy if you do all the work he assigns, he gave ”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“Absolutely no knowledge of his subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • impossible to understand
  • makes his lessons as you enter the room, fly-by-night style
  • strong accent and used to be a tech support guy so

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • really easy if you do all the work he assigns
  • as assigned

Theme 3

💻 About Curriculum Currency

  • teaching html that is outdated and hasnt been used for years
  • HAS NEVER HEARD OF DREAMWEAVER
  • he's not familiar w/CS4.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews from 2009-2011, all critical or lukewarm, with no grade data and limited course coverage.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CIS122 reviews
CIS721 review
CIS72A1 review
FLASH54A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values