AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ryan Yamada

MAT10 · MAT36 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; experience may depend heavily on the course and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear lecturesSelf-study neededReasonable testsNice and helpfulMixed by course
  • and and tests.
  • Another says he cannot teach and you must learn on your own.
  • Too few reviews to trust a single overall pattern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Tests and ; .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

MAT10 felt hard to learn, MAT36 felt reasonable.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; one strong avoid for MAT10.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Homework and tests described as reasonable; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

as reasonable; overall load not described as heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Clear and helpful in one course; unable to teach in another.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

strong Trig praise versus weak MAT10 teaching claims.

Main concern

Conflicting quality reports with almost no sample size.

What students said

“cant teach. expect to learn it all on your own.”
MAT10
“Very good Trig teacher. and .”
MAT36

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests described as reasonable in Trig; proctoring details are not given.

Reasonable testsHomework assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Homework and tests appear standard and reasonable where mentioned.

Reasonable testsHomework assignments
“homework assignments and things”
MAT36

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very good Trig teacher. and tests were reasonable, was always willing to explain things, and overall just a nice guy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

✅

70/100

“Very good Trig teacher. and .”

📚

30/100

“cant teach. expect to learn it all on your own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • cant teach. expect to learn it all on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and
  • overall just a nice guy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from 2009-2010; too little data for strong conclusions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT101 review
MAT361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values