AI Rate Professor

English

Nicholas Valdez

ENG1A · WRT10 · ENGL3006 · ENG1B · ENG50 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a memorable English class and are willing to put in real writing work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCharming LecturerHighly RecommendedWriting GrowthOpen MindedNot Laid Back
  • Near-universal praise for , and fun English teaching.
  • Students say they learn a lot and improve writing even when work is real.
  • He is flexible and approachable, but not a free ride for people seeking zero effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and expects real work, though many still succeed and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but comments stress you cannot coast and winter-session writing is demanding.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly state a , though engagement is strongly encouraged by the class vibe.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students repeatedly call him the and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, while overall tone still feels fair and growth-focused.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Peer reviews, essays, and active participation mean real work rather than a featherlight load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students praise his charm, clarity, openness, and ability to make English enjoyable and informative.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Writing, peer reviews, discussions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and high-learning with strong peer review and discussion culture.

Main concern

, so this is not ideal for students seeking a completely laid-back A.

What students said

“I think this is one of the only classes that I have learned SO much!!!!!!!!! !!!!!”
WRT10
“ , but it helped me become better at writing.”
ENG1A
“He is the . Cool and friendly professor.”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essay writing and required on papers.

Essay FocusedPeer ReviewsTopic ChoiceHelpful Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and writing growth rather than described proctored exams.

Essay FocusedPeer ReviewsTopic ChoiceHelpful Feedback
“ , but it helped me become better at writing.”
ENG1A
“Peer reviews were great! Plus, he's pretty cute. ; !!”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I think this is one of the only classes that I have learned SO much!!!!!!!!! !!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 uniformly positive in-person reviews, highlighting engagement, writing growth, and real effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

94/100

“He has a flow and makes his class super fun and informative.”

👍

95/100

“He is the Best.... !!!!!!!”

✍️ Real Writing Growth

80/100

“My writing really took a leap forward. I had a terrific experience.”

⚖️ Not A Free Ride

55/100

“ if you want a laid back class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super charming in the way he speaks
  • great at explaining and speaks well
  • very OPEN MINDED

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • you have to do work
  • , and easy going.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Cool and friendly professor
  • he was very flexible and gave me different options
  • he's pretty cute.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight consistently glowing in-person reviews support a , but all are from 2008-2010 with limited grade data.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG503 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENG1B1 review
ENGL30061 review
WRT101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values