AI Rate Professor

English

Debra Vance

ENG1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Skip unless you only want an easy A and can tolerate favoritism and wasted class time.

Best fit · Easy A HunterHypocritePlays FavoritesEasy A But PainfulWaste of Class TimeLate to Class
  • Students call her a hypocrite who plays favorites and grades by topic preference.
  • Class time feels like a waste while she lectures about adulthood and often arrives late.
  • One review says an easy A is possible if you endure the poor classroom experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One student explicitly says she is an easy A if you tolerate bad class time, though .

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings are low to moderate and complaints focus on teaching style more than hard content.

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; reviews only note she is often late herself.

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Both reviews rate quality 1 and describe hypocrisy, favoritism, and wasted class time.

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students say she plays favorites and .

Format shift

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Reviews focus on class time .

Format shift

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students call class a waste, say she blabs, arrives late, and is unhelpful.

Format shift

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essay topics and .

Format shift

All evidence is from two in-person ENG1A reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person ENG1A reviews paint her as unfair, unhelpful, and hypocritical, with one note that grades can still be easy.

Main concern

Favoritism and if .

What students said

“Complete HYPOCRITE. , but she doesnt tell you that if it doesnt involve something she likes, she will automatically give you a bad grade.”
ENG1A
“If your looking for an easy A , but youll have to suffer the complete waste of your time when you go to class!”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reviews.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your looking for an easy A , but youll have to suffer the complete waste of your time when you go to class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews from 2009, highlighting hypocrisy, wasted class time, and a possible easy A. Credibility rating: Low.

💀 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ ..she just blabs about how you are adults now and in college not high school...”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“She is a teacher that , so you should kiss butt if you know what i mean! Horrible!”

🎯 Easy Grade Angle

78/100

“If your looking for an easy A , but youll have to suffer the complete waste of your time when you go to class!”

Theme 1

⚖️ About Fairness & Favorites

  • Complete HYPOCRITE.
  • she will automatically give you a bad grade
  • She is a teacher that

Theme 2

🕒 About Class Time

  • complete waste of time when in class
  • she is late almost every single day
  • she just blabs

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two very old 2009 reviews with no grades or and limited detail breadth.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values