AI Rate Professor

Physics

Yunjin Choi

PHY2A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you already master the material and can .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyVague explanationsNo curveAvoids questions
  • Students report and vague lab instructions.
  • Exams are brutal with midterm averages around 29% and .
  • Office hours are short, makeups are refused, and both reviews urge others not to enroll.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Grades of D and Drop, a 29% midterm average with , and only 20% recovery on failed exams make an A effectively out of reach.

All evidence comes from two in-person PHY-2A reviews; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Both students rate difficulty at 5 and describe rushed, incomplete explanations that leave concepts opaque.

All difficulty comments are from in-person PHY-2A only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as mandatory and another as not mandatory, so policy is inconsistent across sections.

reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both reviews open with and report zero willingness to take her again.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Tough grader tags, no curve on a 29% midterm, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Test-heavy and lecture-heavy tags plus high-stakes exams with little support create a heavy load.

Format shift

Workload evidence is from in-person PHY-2A only.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students call her an inefficient lecturer who skips explanations, rushes out after class, and refuses makeups.

Format shift

Both in-person reviews rate quality at 1 with no positives.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Test heavy and graded by few things tags .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHY-2A reviews describe confusing , and unavailable or unhelpful office hours.

Main concern

Failing or dropping is common because and support is minimal.

What students said

“ !! In lectures she doesn't fully explain how she gets to a certain solution.”
PHY-2A
“Midterm average was 29% with .”
PHY-2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

a curve, and recovery on failed exams is tightly capped.

In-person examsNo curveLimited exam recoveryTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

29% with no curve, and failed exams recover only about 20% of lost points.

In-person examsNo curveLimited recoveryTest heavy
“If you fail an exam you can only regain 20% of .”
PHY-2A
“Midterm average was 29% with .”
PHY-2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! In lectures she doesn't fully explain how she gets to a certain solution.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Inefficient lecturer. Midterm average was 29% with .”

📉 Easy A Reality

8/100

“If you fail an exam you can only regain 20% of .”

🚪 Recommendation

5/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • In lectures she doesn't fully explain how she gets to a certain solution.
  • Her instructions in .
  • When asked to work through an example, she said, You can solve it on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Midterm average was 29% with .
  • If you fail an exam you can only regain 20% of .
  • I was hospitalized with doctor's notes, but she still refused a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent, highly consistent negative reviews with specific grade and ; sample is small but narrative is coherent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHY-2A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1