AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kenneth May

CNITR170 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can self-manage online AI work and verify the .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasCaringRespectedMixed OrganizationIntro AI Online
  • one found a and dropped.
  • Both reviews are fully online for CNIT-R170 Intro to AI with no textbook required.
  • He is seen as nice and respected, but structure and grade clarity are inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned a B+ while another withdrew, so an A is possible but not free or guaranteed.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Intro AI content sits at moderate difficulty with reported difficulty ratings around 2 to 3.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

while the other reports mandatory weekly Zoom.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and loved it, the other dropped and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Limited grade data shows a B+ and a .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

One student tagged lots of homework while the other focused on confusion rather than sheer volume.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Described as caring and respected, but teaching clarity and course structure are strongly disputed.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Quizzes appear on Canvas, but and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CNIT-R170 is polarizing: one student thrived with and aimless Zoom.

Main concern

and weekly objectives beyond quizzes.

What students said

“The syllabus had clearly defined goals for every single week and links to all the study material in there.”
CNIT-R170
“ and has nothing in the grade book except for quizzes. I dropped due to his disorganized structure.”
CNIT-R170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and weekly Zoom meetings.

QuizzesWeekly Zoom

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence mentions quizzes on Canvas and weekly Zoom with , but .

Canvas quizzesWeekly Zoom
“ and has nothing in the grade book except for quizzes.”
CNIT-R170
“There was a weekly zoom meeting with no objective.”
CNIT-R170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't know what that guy's talking about saying the . The syllabus had clearly defined goals for every single week and links to all the study material in there.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews, highlighting organization conflict and mixed satisfaction. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“I really enjoyed this class and felt like I learned a lot!”

📁 Course Organization

35/100

“ and has nothing in the grade book except for quizzes.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“He did appear to be a nice person, however.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really enjoyed this class and felt like I learned a lot!
  • Unorganized. Took Professor May's Intro to AI Class, and I was so .

Theme 2

📂

  • The syllabus had clearly defined goals for every single week and links to all the study material in there.
  • What am I being graded on?

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent online reviews with opposite conclusions limit reliability despite some detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CNIT-R1702 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1