AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Carlos Perez

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option; expect , and little help.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear InstructionsNo Partial CreditPoor CommunicationPowerPoint Only
  • and little clarification
  • No partial credit turns small mistakes into zero credit
  • Students report rudeness, withheld slides, and weak communication

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Reported grades are B to D- with no partial credit and last-minute changing requirements.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Difficulty ratings of 4-5 plus vague projects and heavy prep outside class make content feel brutal.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and say you must arrive with projects already finished.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and uniformly negative communication and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; small mistakes wipe entire assignments.

Format shift

In-person only; all .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework and projects that must be ready before class despite promises of in-class time.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Described as a PowerPoint professor who withholds slides, is rude, and will not answer basic questions.

Format shift

In-person only; tone is consistently negative across four reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Mostly projects with only one paper mentioned; finals exist but .

Format shift

In-person only; projects dominate over traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person engineering sections feel hostile and , and poor answers to basic questions.

Main concern

and slow or absent clarification.

What students said

“his asigments are made as vague as possible and getting an answer is like pulling teeth.”
71769
“Mr. Perez does not provide partial credit, so a small mistake results in receiving no credit for an entire assignment.”
71769
“He is not good at communicating with .”
71769

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; proctoring tools are not described.

No partial creditUnclear final questionsProject-heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficulty getting answers about the final.

No partial creditDifficult final Q and AProject-based
“He will also be difficult when asking question about the final.”
71769
“Mr. Perez does not provide partial credit, so a small mistake results in receiving no credit for an entire assignment.”
71769

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“his asigments are made as vague as possible and getting an answer is like pulling teeth.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

16/100

“this man is a and wont give you the .”

⚖️

12/100

“Mr. Perez does not provide partial credit, so a small mistake results in receiving no credit for an entire assignment.”

📢 Poor Communication

18/100

“He's not the and has very dry .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is rude and wont answer basic questions.
  • and leave everyone to dry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to come to class with the .
  • getting clarification can be difficult as .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent aligned negative reviews with and communication details, but small sample and one course code.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

717694 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values