AI Rate Professor

Geology

Brittany Huerta

R101 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn rocks mostly on your own and still handle mandatory class and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnprepared LecturesNot ApproachableHeavy ReadingTest Heavy
  • and say she is hard to approach for help.
  • and labs, but many still struggle and some withdraw.
  • and expectations feel high for an intro geology class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and labs can save you, but and poor teaching make a clean A hard for many.

Online evidence is one withdrawal after Proctorio and late help; cases.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students call the , and material harder than other intro sciences despite being about rocks.

Both formats describe high difficulty; and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with participation expected.

; the online review listed attendance not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Roughly one in , and most comments warn others not to enroll.

Recommendation is weak in both formats, with the lone online review also advising against her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and several students report B or C despite effort.

Format shift

In-person reviews stress tough grading; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and test-heavy structure create steady weekly load.

Format shift

and reading; and proctored exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many say lectures mirror the textbook, lack clarity, and feel unprepared or unapproachable.

Format shift

In-person holds most teaching critiques; style.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and and participation.

Format shift

and ; others also flag tests as heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most in-person reviews call lectures textbook-like, unhelpful, and unapproachable, with a and care.

Main concern

Weak lectures plus mandatory .

What students said

“Would not take her class ever again. can ask for help.”
R101
“Her lectures are exactly what the textbook says and could not describe it well for the class.”
R101
“Your grade is heavily weighted on homeworks/labs so even if you do bad in the .”
R101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online , and a withdrawal after a .

Main concern

Delayed support and if you fall behind.

What students said

“She uses proctorio so be sure you know how to use it correctly. I had to withdrawal because my grade dropped.”
R101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are taken seriously with proctoring online and , though homework can offset weak exam scores.

Proctorio OnlineIn-Person ExamsTest HeavyHomework Weighted

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy structure but do not clearly describe open-book or .

Test HeavyExams Plus Labs
“Your grade is heavily weighted on homeworks/labs so even if you do bad in the .”
R101

Online

Online student reports Proctorio and .

Proctorio
“She uses proctorio so be sure you know how to use it correctly.”
R101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (1 online, 8 in , and approachability themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Did not know how to lecture nor was prepared to present her lectures.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ .”

⚖️

32/100

“Too high of expectations for a class about rocks.”

📚

35/100

“Be prepared to figure things out on your own even though she offers help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Did not know how to lecture nor was prepared to present her lectures.
  • Her lectures are exactly what the textbook says and could not describe it well for the class.
  • Class time often lacks interaction, questions are not always encouraged since she gives a attitude.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Harder than micro,chem,bio,earth sci,anat and physio
  • Your grade is heavily weighted on homeworks/labs so even if you do bad in the .
  • I had to withdrawal because my grade dropped.

Theme 3

💬 About Approachability

  • can ask for help.
  • .
  • Passive aggressive and not approachable during class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent detailed reviews with mixed grades and consistent themes, though online evidence is only one review.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

R1019 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2