AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jessica Kuang

MATHR134 · MATH14 · MATH105 · MATHR105 · MATH122 · CALC1 · MATH134 · STATS · STATISTIC31053 · 66 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73.53%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her for stats if and keep up with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVideo-based flipped teachingHeavy homework loadStats-friendly online structureLate passes and retakesPolarizing lecture style
  • Many students thrive in her video-driven stats classes with , and .
  • Critics say she barely lectures live, uses outdated videos, and forces self-teaching plus group work.
  • Workload is consistently heavy, but an A is realistic if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many As appear after heavy weekly homework and and late passes rather than .

Online students more often call the A path structured and doable; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Stats becomes digestible with her videos, but formulas, volume of practice, and some upper math courses stay non-trivial.

Online stats often feels .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Online sections are often flexible, while many in-person and .

Online reviews ; and quizzes matter more.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Most recommend her for stats organization and support, but a .

Online recommendation is stronger overall; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Late passes, , unlimited homework tries, and practice tests soften grading for students who keep pace.

Format shift

Leniency tools are mentioned most in online stats; some students still call her a .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of a week plus quizzes.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

and caring help; critics say live teaching is weak, outdated, or absent.

Format shift

Online teaching reputation .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Weekly online homework and unit exams that often mirror practice work.

Format shift

Online courses commonly pair weekly modules with a few on-campus exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and office-hour recovery, others say she and class time is group work or life talk.

Main concern

Flipped style and limited live teaching frustrate students who need traditional board lectures.

What students said

“There are little to no in-class lecturing, and . ... Tests are open-note and not too difficult.”
MATH134
“Does not actually teach, just makes you watch videos of other professors.”
CALC1
“Professor Kuang assigns a heavy workload, but that's expected in an accelerated course. ... earning an A is very doable if you put in the effort.”
MATHR134

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and many easy-to-follow success stories, with some complaints about old or .

Main concern

Heavy time cost and uneven lecture video quality; a few .

What students said

“I LOVED professor Kuang. ... It was time consuming as I did spend +- 4 hours for but .”
MATHR105
“Amazing professor. I am not the , but she made statistics easy to digest.”
MATH105
“Outdated lecture videos that are sometimes up to 9 years old using outdated calculators.”
STATS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and practice tests, with friendliness varying by section and format.

Practice testsQuiz retakesOn-site exams in some online sectionsOpen-note tests in some in-person sectionsHomework-aligned exams

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequent quizzes; others feel test-heavy with limited live instruction.

Open-note tests in some sectionsWeekly quizzesTest heavy tagsGroup correction after quizzes
“Class starts with a correct mistakes. and not too difficult.”
MATH134
“Weekly quizzes and if you attend her office hours, which allow students to improve past grades.”
MATHR134

Online

and a few on-campus or timed exams; proctoring details are not consistently stated.

Quiz retakesPractice testsOn-site exams in some termsHomework-aligned testsLate passes
“3 on site exams. get credit. You are allowed 6 late passes that can be used on HMWK and quizzes.”
MATH105
“The and quizzes! She gives 2 attempts for quizzes.”
MATHR105
“3 tests are taken in person and no notes. She gives a practice test.”
MATH105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I LOVED professor Kuang. I took statistics previously with a different professor and failed. Her class is set up amazingly with and Sundays.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting video-based stats success, heavy homework, and polarized lecture style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Amazing professor. I am not the , but she made statistics easy to digest.”

📚

34/100

“There is so much hw, but if you stay on top of it every week, you will pass!”

🔁 Flipped Class Friction

40/100

“Does not actually teach, just makes you watch videos of other professors.”

👍 Recommendation

73/100

“For anyone looking for a !”

Theme 1

🎬 About Teaching Style

  • She embeds lots of videos with , and .
  • There are little to no in-class lecturing, and .
  • Outdated lecture videos that are sometimes up to 9 years old.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • earning an A is very doable if you put in the effort.
  • Overall, it is easy to get an A in this class as long as you do the work.
  • Her stats class online was really difficult, I had to a lot of the content.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Structure

  • Lots of homework
  • She gives 6 late passes for hw & quizzes.
  • Homework can be completed anytime

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

66

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats provide rich, repeated evidence despite a polarized minority.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH10516 reviews
MATHR10514 reviews
STATS4 reviews
1223 reviews
MATH143 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1222 reviews
MATH1342 reviews
MATHR1342 reviews
314341 review
323601 review
CALC11 review
STATISTIC310531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 6 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1