AI Rate Professor

Biology

Michael Abram

ANAT01 · PHYSIOLOGYR101 · PHSO101 · ANATOMYR101 · PHSOR101 · PHYSO101 · ANATANDPHYS · PHYSIOLOGY · PHYS101 · ANATR101 · ANAT1 · ANAT101 · ANATOMY101 · PHYSO01 · 123 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid if you need a respectful classroom; only consider for if and have thick skin.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDiscriminatory toward disabled studentsFrequent off-topic lecturesTake-home lecture examsExtra credit opportunitiesRude and unprofessional
  • Many recent reviews allege discrimination against hard-of-hearing and disabled students.
  • , so grades can be high despite mixed teaching.
  • Students either call him passionate and real-world or arrogant, rude, and traumatic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and many reported As make a high grade reachable with reading and lab attention.

Online reviews rarely discuss grades; Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is real A&P depth with reading and , but so overall challenge is moderate.

Both formats describe fast or off-topic lectures; difficulty ratings are more mixed online.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and skipping hurts lab and exam prep.

A , but the majority across formats treat it as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Would-take-again is under 43 percent and recent comments strongly warn about discrimination and humiliation.

Online reviews are ; older in-person reviews are more split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, and frequent keep many students at A or B.

Format shift

; online reviews emphasize toughness and disability issues more than curves.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and occasional papers, but not constant nightly grind for everyone.

Format shift

Some online tags cite lots of homework and papers; .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

some call lectures informative and caring, but many report rudeness, discrimination, and off-topic rambling.

Format shift

Online teaching experience scores collapse due to disability-discrimination complaints; in-person is mixed older praise and critique.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

while and participation still weigh heavily.

Format shift

reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and passion, while others call him rude, off-topic, and offensive.

Main concern

Off-topic tangents, inappropriate jokes, and occasional reports of abusive behavior toward students.

What students said

“ so if you follow your the syllabus, lecture, and .”
PHYS101
“Very nice and caring towards students. Gives opportunities. Lectures are good.”
ANAT101
“ . Inappropriate jokes and remarks sometimes rude and offensive.”
ANATR101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly hostile, focusing on disability discrimination, Zoom unprofessionalism, and berating students.

Main concern

Repeated reports of discriminating against hard-of-hearing students and humiliating them in class.

What students said

“ IF YOU ARE HARD OF HEARING HE WILL BERATE YOU AND YOUR TRANSLATOR FOR YOUR DISABILITY IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE CLASS”
ANATOMY101
“Discriminates against students that are disabled. This is demonstrable with the video, y'all know which one I'm talking about.”
ANAT01
“This professor is the . He is rude, mocks his students, and does not teach the material.”
ANAT01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

while labs remain in-class practicums, which most students call grade-friendly.

Take-Home Lecture ExamsLab PracticumsExtra CreditCamera Attendance Pressure

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Multiple students report and optional .

Take-Home Lecture ExamsLab PracticumsExtra Credit
“ so if you follow your the syllabus, lecture, and .”
PHYS101
“ . Study for lab practicums.”
PHSO101
“Because of even after years that I retained what he has taught.”
PHYSIOLOGYR101

Online

; one notes camera-on attendance pressure during remote periods.

Camera Attendance Emphasis
“He wants your cameras on and even if you are there with your camera off, he says its your right. He doesnt count that as being present.”
PHYS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF YOU ARE HARD OF HEARING HE WILL BERATE YOU AND YOUR TRANSLATOR FOR YOUR DISABILITY IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE CLASS”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

♿ Disability Discrimination Risk

15/100

“Discriminates against students that are disabled. This is demonstrable with the video, y'all know which one I'm talking about.”

📝

82/100

“ so if you follow your the syllabus, lecture, and .”

🔀 Polarized Classroom Climate

36/100

“He is disrespectful to females. He forced a vegan student to watch a movie that showed cows being skinned alive.”

👍 Recommendation Split

34/100

“ !”

Theme 1

♿ About Disability and Respect

  • Berates hard of hearing students for no reason.
  • Discriminatory. unless you have the hearing of a bat
  • He abuses disabled students and minorities.

Theme 2

📚 About Exams and Workload

  • a lot of info.
  • His class is easy. and lab exams arent hard if you
  • You get a and a in class test based on memorization.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Teaching Style

  • spends more time off topic than he is on topic
  • He constantly goes off topic which is very frustrating.
  • Dr. Abram is so passionate about his students learning.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

123

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews span 2014-2025 with and recent disability discrimination.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 573
4 out of 515
3 out of 511
2 out of 54
1 out of 520

Course coverage

PHSOR1019 reviews
PHSO1017 reviews
ANAT016 reviews
ANAT1016 reviews
PHYS1015 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ANAT13 reviews
ANATOMY1013 reviews
ANATOMYR1012 reviews
ANATR1012 reviews
PHYSIOLOGY2 reviews
PHYSIOLOGYR1012 reviews
ANATANDPHYS1 review
PHYSO011 review
PHYSO1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 7 · A 21

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1