AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Catalina Yang

MATH106 · MATH014 · STATS105 · MATHR005 · MATH120 · MATH011 · TM2 · MATH115 · MATHR011 · MATH11 · MATHR105 · R105 · MATHRO14 · MATHR032 · MATH14 · MATH105 · MATHR106 · MATH2 · STATISTICS105 · R014 · MATHRO32 · MATHR01434039 · 95 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
37.84%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Run if you want a manageable math class; if you thrive under heavy workload and fast-paced, no-hand-holding instruction.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming homework loadTough graderExtremely fast lecturesQuizzes every classHigh drop rates
  • Most students report , and tests that feel designed to fail them.
  • Lectures are widely called too fast and , with little patience for questions.
  • A minority who put in heavy effort and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many Fs, Ds, and drops; As require nonstop homework, quizzes, and .

; online adds timed chat participation pressure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

, and frequent quizzes make content feel much harder than typical community-college stats.

Online and in-person both emphasize speed and volume; online stack of same-day deadlines is especially brutal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and participation or weekly quizzes punish absences.

Online forces live chat answers for points; and mandatory flags.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is about 38 percent and the dominant student message is do not register.

Online comments are nearly all negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and many report failing curves or zero makeups.

Format shift

; a few in-person students still earn As with heavy effort.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

, and multiple exams create an overwhelming load.

Format shift

Online students describe seven HW sets plus double quizzes due the same day; .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are fast rambling lectures, skipped steps, and dismissive help; minority call lectures strong if you keep up.

Format shift

Online teaching is nearly all panned; in-person is polarized but still negative overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes every class, several midterms, and .

Format shift

Both formats stress quizzes and tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

fast lectures, and tough grading, with a few strong-math students succeeding.

Main concern

Easy to fall behind; grading and pace leave many failing or dropping.

What students said

“The amount of . Lectures are quite difficult to follow”
MATH120
“SAVE YOURSELF AND !!”
MATHR105
“her lectures are so good and I actually learned in her class.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report massive homework stacks, chat-box timed answers, fast unit switches, and many withdrawals.

Main concern

Extreme workload plus little help and .

What students said

“You can have 7 hw sets with double the and .”
MATHR105
“Professor Yang would give WAY LOTS of homework and quizzes. She does teaches in a hurry”
MATHR005
“Horrible! Rude, diminishes students, lack of teaching skills, does not care for students, fast paced”
MATH105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent quizzes and strict and high-pressure.

Weekly QuizzesTest HeavyPop QuizzesHomework-Linked ExamsNo Makeup

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students face daily or , and rare makeups.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyNo Makeup QuizzesHomework-Based Quizzes
“There is a 1 question quiz given every week. 4-5 exams.”
STATISTICS105
“The the text, it would always have really difficult questions”
MATHRO32
“No make up for with half no matter how good.”
MATHR105

Online

, and exams together with timed chat participation.

Timed Chat AnswersWeekly QuizzesHeavy Same-Day Deadlines
“would makes us solve the problem and put in the answer in the chat box with not that much time to do. If you don't .”
MATHR005
“You can have 7 hw sets with double the and .”
MATHR105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SAVE YOURSELF AND !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and and pace. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Overwhelming Workload

12/100

“The amount of .”

🎯 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“She is really bad at explaining concepts but will expect you to understand every little thing for quizzes and exams.”

⚖️

22/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“I would highly recommend finding a different stats class before you register for this class.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Insane amount of work, quizes
  • you will not pass this class without professor Yang.
  • ! SIMPLE AS THAT.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very disorganized basically her just rambling for 2 hours straight
  • Talks way to fast to keep up with.
  • her lectures are so good and I actually learned in her class.

Theme 3

💼 About Workload

  • assigns wayy too much hw!!
  • be prepared to spend a lot of
  • 7 hw sets with double the and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

95

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years show highly , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 510
3 out of 514
2 out of 518
1 out of 537

Course coverage

MATHR1058 reviews
MATH1056 reviews
MATH1155 reviews
MATH0144 reviews
STATISTICS1054 reviews
Show 17 more courses
MATHR0053 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATHR0112 reviews
MATHR1062 reviews
TM22 reviews
MATH0111 review
MATH1061 review
MATH111 review
MATH141 review
MATH21 review
MATHR014340391 review
MATHR0321 review
MATHRO141 review
MATHRO321 review
R0141 review
R1051 review
STATS1051 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

6

D+ 1 · D 4 · D- 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

17

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1