AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jacquelyne Ta

MATH106 · MATHR115 · MATHR010 · MATH105 · MATHR105 · MATHR106 · MATHR011 · R115 · R120 · R001 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you want a and are willing to study hard for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lectures for manyTest-heavy gradingLots of homeworkCaring but mixed clarityPractice tests help
  • Many students love her thorough lectures and .
  • Tests and ; an A takes real effort.
  • A and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible but , and tutoring hours, not minimal effort.

; online evidence is thin but and tests mattering.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

College math content stays demanding even when lectures help, with difficulty ratings often 3-5.

, and algebra; online also reports moderate-to-hard difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory, with .

In ; one online review said no, but the rest still emphasize showing up or staying engaged.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About 70 percent would , though a vocal minority strongly warns against her.

; the few online reviews are mostly positive with one no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some and retakes appear, but tough grading and .

Format shift

In person has both fans and tough-grader critics; .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

and test load; in person also notes papers and group work.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority call lectures amazing and clear, but .

Format shift

Positive in-person lecture praise dominates recent reviews; online is mostly strong with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests can be 60 percent plus a 20 percent final, with quizzes and .

Format shift

; online also tags test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly strong praise for organized lectures and care, mixed with critiques of , and .

Main concern

Test-heavy weighting and occasional unclear lectures hurt students who need more structure.

What students said

“She wants you to succeed in her class and .”
MATHR115
“ !!!!!!!”
R115
“the practice finals and and .”
MATHR106

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly praise clear lectures and and test-heavy load.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I start to like Math because of Professor Ta.”
MATHR105
“This professor, as a lecturer, is on par with university professors.”
MATHR106
“ .”
MATHR106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; practice tests often mirror real exams, which helps if you prepare.

Test heavyPractice tests similar to examsChapter tests and quizzesHomework weekly

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, tests and finals dominate; practice finals closely match real exams and .

Tests worth majority of gradePractice finals match examsQuizzes per chapterPossible test retake
“Tests worth 60%, Final worth 20%, class work worth 20%.”
MATH106
“the practice finals and and .”
MATHR106
“ .”
MATHR011

Online

Online comments emphasize test-heavy load and .

Test heavyLots of homeworkCanvas resources
“ .”
MATHR106
“All the tools needed to succeed were found in CANVAS.”
MATHR106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am not the , but with her she can break everything down to you and make it seem easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, balancing strong lecture praise with test-heavy and clarity concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and lectures about the subject.”

📝 Test Pressure

48/100

“Tests worth 60%, Final worth 20%, class work worth 20%.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

⚠️ Negative Experience

25/100

“Perhaps the worst professor I had at Oxnard College.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her lectures are very thorough and easy to understand.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You have to .
  • 1 homework assignment per week, 1 test and .
  • It's an easy A if you do your work and show up class for group work and quizzes.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and understanding.
  • Prof. , and helpful.
  • She really cares about her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

20 reviews from 2017-2026 with detailed grade and workload comments show a consistent majority-positive but split picture.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATHR1065 reviews
MATH1054 reviews
MATH1062 reviews
MATHR1052 reviews
MATHR1152 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATHR0101 review
MATHR0111 review
R0011 review
R1151 review
R1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1