AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Antonio Ortiz

R130 · R160 · R160L · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

unless you only need an easy pass and plan to teach yourself from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTeaching DisasterNo Real LearningEasy PassDisorganized LabsAvoid
  • All three reviews rate quality 1 and say almost no real learning happened.
  • Classes are an easy A because material is incomplete, cancelled, or .
  • Students report , and poor Canvas use.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

All three students got As while saying the class was incomplete, cancelled often, and required little real instruction.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Content was slow, incomplete, or already known, so intellectual challenge was very low.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory even though learning value is described as very low.

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students say he should not teach, they learned nothing, and .

All evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Everyone reported an A despite missing units, incomplete labs, and cancelled work.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Featherlight

88/100

Labs and exams were reduced or cancelled, so actual workload stayed very light.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Reviews describe laziness, disorganization, wrong materials, and almost no useful teaching.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Labs and limited graded items dominate; and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as unprepared, incomplete, and easy to pass with almost no learning.

Main concern

You will not learn the material and may face cancellations and .

What students said

“I did not learn a single thing. Easy pass but no learning.”
r160
“Do NOT hire.”
r160L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe cancelled or ; assessment is light and incomplete.

Reduced ExamsIncomplete CoverageGraded by Few Things

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say a second unit exam was never made and coverage was incomplete; .

Reduced ExamsIncomplete Coverage
“He was too lazy to make a , and he cancelled class quite a few times.”
r160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did not learn a single thing. Easy pass but no learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 highly consistent negative in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Should not be allowed to teach circuits ever again.”

😴 No Learning

5/100

“I learned much more from reading the textbook than I did in class.”

🟢 Easy Pass

94/100

“Statics is easy enough to self study, so this class is an easy pass.”

🧪 Broken Labs

10/100

“he once gave us the wrong parts, causing us to postpone the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He didn't help at all when we had problems
  • and doesn't .
  • Do NOT hire.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy pass but no learning.
  • this class is an easy pass. 0/5.
  • We were supposed to do 10+ labs, but NOPE. 5 is all we got.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only three same-day reviews, but they are detailed, highly consistent, and all rate quality at 1.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

r1301 review
r1601 review
r160L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values