Dianne Habring

R101 · HEDR104 · HEDR113 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 74/100
RMP rating: 4.6/5
Take again: 80%
Difficulty: 2.2

The decision

Still a solid Health Science pick for structured work and As, but verify communication and due-date policies in the current term.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring when responsiveClear due datesAssignment-heavyAttendance can matterFree textbook reported

Most older reviews love her organization, care, and A-friendly attitude
One recent online review flags zeros on past-due work, wrong info, and
; textbook can be free in some sections

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Nearly all reported grades are A-range, but and redo-zero comments show the A still needs timely, correct work.

In-person reviews emphasize she wants every student to get an A; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content is described as interesting and straightforward when lectures and .

Both formats rate difficulty around 2-3; online friction is more about process than concept hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews alternate between mandatory attendance that affects the grade and .

Online and across terms.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students loved her and organization and communication.

In-person is fully positive; online is mixed due to the 2024 complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Historically patient and A-oriented, but also tagged tough grader with punitive zeros until work is fixed.

Format shift

Leniency praise is stronger in person; the .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Assignments are central and one review cites lots of .

Format shift

Online more often complains about assignment volume and redos; .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and care dominate older feedback despite one recent communication failure.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is cleaner; online depends on whether modules and email work that term.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and completing posted work more than big exams.

Format shift

; assignment workflow is the shared theme.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and a professor who wants everyone to earn an A.

Main concern

some find motivating and others stressful.

What students said

“She really wants every student to get an A. and understanding.”
HEDR104

“I loved how she puts your assignments to 0's until you do the assignments and changes it your grade”
HEDR113

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

two glowing reviews for clarity and care, one recent harsh review on zeros, busywork, and ignored emails.

Main concern

Recent report of , and no email response.

What students said

“ and due dates and . The textbook is for FREE.”
R101

“ and then give you 0s expecting you to do them again.”
HEDR104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students mainly discuss assignments and participation rather than proctored or .

Assignment-drivenParticipation mattersExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize lectures and .

Lecture-basedAssignment grade updatesExtra credit

“Her lectures are amazing and goes straight to the point.”
HEDR113

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use; they focus on due dates and .

Clear due datesAssignment zeros until completion

“due dates and .”
R101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She is awesome and loves her students. She really wants every student to get an A.”
Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in person), balancing older praise with one recent complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Her lectures are amazing and goes straight to the point. It is very interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“I loved taking this class! and due dates and .”

⚠️ Recent Friction

40/100

“ . YOU MUST GO TO CLASS GRADE DEPENDS ON IT.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

lectures are amazing and goes straight to the point
and due dates and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

She really wants every student to get an A
puts your assignments to 0's until you do the assignments

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

A very caring Professor
Total sweetie pie, loved her
and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2018-2024 with rich detail but a and one recent negative, lowering confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54

4 out of 50

3 out of 51

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

HEDR1043 reviews

HEDR1131 review

R1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values