AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Oliver Williams

PSYV04 · PSYCH3132 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Skip if ; sparse reviews already lean negative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveConfusing lecturesTypos in videosDoes not explainLow care for pass rates
  • Sparse and mixed reviews with strong negatives on clarity and responsiveness.
  • One student still earned an A online despite rating teaching quality as 1.
  • In-person feedback flags confusing problem-solving with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A online despite rating teaching poorly, but and study are required.

Only the Online review reports an A; In .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings span moderate to hard, with comments that and study makes it much harder.

In person reviews report higher difficulty than the single Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

The ; other reviews do not clearly contradict that.

review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Take-again rate is 0% and substantive comments focus on confusion, typos, and unresponsiveness.

Negatives appear in both Online and In person substantive reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

An A is possible even with low teaching ratings, but no strong evidence of .

Format shift

Grade evidence comes only from the Online review.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and studying are framed as required; no detailed workload breakdown is given.

Format shift

Workload pressure is clearest in In person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students describe confusing explanations, typos, unresponsiveness, and little care about outcomes.

Format shift

Online focuses on video quality and response; In .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework and study are the main success levers mentioned; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and note low concern for whether students pass; one post is only a prospective question.

Main concern

Solves problems without explaining and .

What students said

“ and solves problems but .if you don't do the homework and STUDY its harder!!! Doesn't care if you pass or don't.”
PSYV04
“does anyone know anything about this professor? i'm thinking about taking a class with him.”
PSYCH3132

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online review is harshly negative on video quality, typos, and unresponsiveness despite an A grade.

Main concern

Unresponsive instructor with error-filled videos.

What students said

“This teacher is on Methamphetamine. You can tell it in his videos. He also makes little mistakes, lots of typos, unresponsive.”
PSYV04

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No In person .

Online

No Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and solves problems but .if you don't do the homework and STUDY its harder!!! Doesn't care if you pass or don't.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting clarity and support themes. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

32/100

“ and solves problems but .”

📵 Responsiveness

20/100

“He also makes little mistakes, lots of typos, unresponsive.”

⚠️ Care for Outcomes

25/100

“Doesn't care if you pass or don't.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and solves problems but
  • lots of typos, unresponsive
  • This teacher is on Methamphetamine. You can tell it in his videos.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you don't do the homework and STUDY its harder!!!
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews, one is a non-review inquiry, dates span 2009-2023, and detail is thin and mixed.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYV042 reviews
PSYCH31321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values