AI Rate Professor

Science

Melissa Graham

30426R100L · MICROLAB · MICRLLAB · BIOLR101L · MICRR100 · BIOLR101 · MICROR100L · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you want a and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringMixed Teaching ClarityExtra CreditLab FocusedWilling to Help
  • Many students call her kind, caring, and willing to help with late work and retakes.
  • Others say explanations confuse more than they clarify, especially in lab and lecture.
  • Grades are often recoverable via curves, , and easy A paths if you complete work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students say an A is easy with , and retakable quizzes.

Easy-A comments appear mainly in person; online students report A/B with steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Microbiology and and can feel condensed or test-heavy.

Online summer micro felt condensed; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some sections report optional attendance while .

Online and and term.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but critics urge switching if .

Recent online reviews are strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Curves, , late work flexibility, and .

Format shift

Leniency themes appear in both formats, especially bio lab and lecture.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Labs, quizzes, presentations, and .

Format shift

Online summer sections feel more condensed; .

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Students split between calling her exceptional and saying she confuses more than she teaches.

Format shift

Online reviews skew highly positive; in-person reviews are more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Blend of , and exams with some test-heavy tags.

Format shift

Online leans on McGraw Hill quizzes and Canvas; and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

mentoring and frustration with unclear explanations, favorites, and uneven lecture clarity.

Main concern

Teaching clarity and consistency vary widely by section and year.

What students said

“It's super easy to get an A, just show up and do the homework but if you actually .”
BIOLR101L
“If you're struggling she's willing to work with you and let you turn in late work.”
BIOLR101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise her as caring and exceptional, noting condensed summer work is doable if you and .

Main concern

Condensed summer pacing still requires steady tracking of online assessments.

What students said

“Do yourself a favor and choose this professor.”
30426R100L
“if stay on track on the McGraw Hill website where your assessment and .”
MICRR100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are standard science assessments, sometimes retakable or .

QuizzesRetakable QuizzesCurved GradesLab-Based Prep

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, exams pull from lab and textbook work; some report easy exams and .

Lab-Based Exam PrepCurved GradesEasy Exams Reported
“Everything you need to know for and in the textbook”
MICROR100L
“Easy class and easy exams.”
BIOLR101L

Online

Online work centers , and a presentation; proctoring is not clearly described.

McGraw Hill QuizzesCanvas AssignmentsPresentation
“if stay on track on the McGraw Hill website where your assessment and .”
MICRR100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's super easy to get an A, just show up and do the homework but if you actually .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (2 online, 13 in person), highlighting caring support versus uneven teaching clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She does a poor job of teaching and explaining, its really frustrating”

👍 Recent Online Praise

80/100

“Do yourself a favor and choose this professor.”

⚖️ Grade Leniency

76/100

“I didn't do good on the tests but I still managed to pass the class with an A.”

❤️ Caring Support

78/100

“truly wants her students to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained things the way SHE understood it which did not help
  • experiments in class will basically answer all your questions
  • Not a great teacher, very boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • super easy to get an A, just show up and do the homework
  • the labs and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • willing to work with you and let you turn in late work
  • but she does have her favorites

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews over many years give solid volume, but opinions conflict and some older comments lack grade detail.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BIOLR101L6 reviews
MICROLAB2 reviews
MICROR100L2 reviews
MICRR1002 reviews
30426R100L1 review
Show 2 more courses
BIOLR1011 review
MICRLLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values