AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Linda Chaparro

PSY131 · PSY107 · PSY101108 · PSY102A · PSY101PSY108 · PSYR101 · PSY30123 · PSHYCOLOGY101 · PSYR108 · SOCR118 · PHYSC101 · PSYCHOLOGY101 · PSYCH101 · PHSYC101 · PSYC101 · PSY108 · PSY101 · SOC118 · R107 · 114 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
31.03%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you want a rigorous, picky writing-heavy psych class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnorganizedEssay-heavy examsPicky expectationsHigh drop rates
  • Many students call her disorganized, unclear, and a .
  • Workload , and multi-question essay midterms and finals.
  • A minority say she prepares you for university-level work if you put in serious effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students say you must and .

Online is purely negative; in-person is mixed but mostly hard-to-get-A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and and writing load high for intro psych.

; the one online review also rates difficulty as extreme.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and several tags say skip class and you will not pass.

Both the online review and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and many students explicitly say do not take her or call her the .

Online is a hard no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and students say only a few essay answers are scored to strict standards.

Format shift

and the bulk of in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Research papers, presentations, chapter outlines, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many call lectures boring or unorganized, though some credit deep knowledge and university-level prep.

Format shift

Online review is extremely negative; in-person opinions are polarized but lean negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and a short presentation with few smaller assignments.

Format shift

In-person reviews dominate assessment detail; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Most in-person reviews , and essay exams; a smaller group praises challenge and university prep.

Main concern

, and frequent reports of no-shows or lost work.

What students said

“The midterms & finals are essays with 20+ questions but she will only grade 3.”
PSY131
“She is VERY picky in the and in the midterm and final.”
PSY101
“ !! Very picky, high unreasonable expectations.”
PSY108
“If you are looking for an easy ride, this is not the class for you”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is extremely negative, , and .

Main concern

Inconsistent requirements and .

What students said

“The . Inconsistent with her standards. Will change requirements on a weekly basis.”
PSYR108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

few answers are graded strictly, which students find harsh and stressful.

Essay midterms and finalsOnly grades a few questionsOptional 3x5 notecard sometimesPicky grading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are multi-question essays where only a few responses are graded, sometimes with a notecard.

20+ essay questionsOnly 3 graded3x5 notecard allowed in some terms
“The midterms & finals are essays with 20+ questions but she will only grade 3.”
PSY131
“She only gives one 3x5 notecard to use so .”
PSY108
“Out of the 12 questions she only grades 3-4 and they have to be long and perfect or else zero or .”
PSY101

Online

Online review does not detail proctoring but and and delayed grading.

Unclear exam formatsChanging requirements
“Her syllabus doesn't cover deadlines, formats for .”
PSYR108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . Inconsistent with her standards.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, organization issues, and essay exams. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Organization Issues

34/100

“ , lectures are very boring”

⚖️

22/100

“She is VERY picky in the and in the midterm and final.”

📝

32/100

“The midterms & finals are essays with 20+ questions but she will only grade 3.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very boring and doesnt give us any good information
  • , and very unwelcoming to certain questions
  • She will really force you to ignite your brain

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Midterm and Final had 20 essay questions only to get 3 graded
  • If you are looking for an easy ride, this is not the class for you

Theme 3

📉 About Course Chaos

  • Will change requirements on a weekly basis
  • We did not receive our syllabus with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

114

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show recurring themes of tough grading, disorganization, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 517
3 out of 518
2 out of 513
1 out of 526

Course coverage

PSY10115 reviews
PHSYC1015 reviews
PSYR1015 reviews
PSYR1085 reviews
PSY1084 reviews
Show 14 more courses
PSY1312 reviews
SOC1182 reviews
PHYSC1011 review
PSHYCOLOGY1011 review
PSY1011081 review
PSY101PSY1081 review
PSY102A1 review
PSY1071 review
PSY301231 review
PSYC1011 review
PSYCH1011 review
PSYCHOLOGY1011 review
R1071 review
SOCR1181 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

12

B+ 3 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4