AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Brett Enge

MO14 · MATH · MATH106 · MATH14 · MATHR009 · MATH105 · MATHR105 · R105 · MATH15 · MATH116 · R014 · MATHR116 · STATSR105 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will attend, study, and ask questions; if you want an easy A or hand-holding.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEffort equals gradeColor-coded lecturesMandatory attendanceHelpful if you askNo hand-holding
  • Most students praise him as , and fair if you show up and study hard
  • As require real work; and fast pace trip up underprepared students
  • ; videos, MyMathLab, and group work are common tools

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Multiple students say you earn what you deserve, need note cards and videos, and will not pass without real study.

Online review ; most hard-work evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Stats and intermediate math are called difficult with a , and a .

Online and ; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing more than a couple classes risks failing.

; online sample is only one review.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and earned fairness despite some pace and toughness complaints.

; the one online review is more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

He grades what you earn with little ; some call it tough or nit-picky, others call it fair.

Format shift

; in-person views are mixed but mostly fair.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect quizzes, midterms, finals, MyMathLab or , and heavy study outside class.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and willingness to help those who ask; a minority say he is fast or vague.

Format shift

In-person praise dominates; one online review is cooler on pace.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly quizzes, multiple midterms, cumulative finals, and MyMathLab drive .

Format shift

; online also stresses quizzes and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In as a dedicated, color-coding math teacher who rewards attendance and effort with fair earned grades.

Main concern

, and little punish missed classes or half effort.

What students said

“If you want an A you'll need to work for it. He'll give you what you deserve.”
MATH105
“ .”
MATHR105
“He will not hold your hand or offer E.C.”
R014

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review says he is cool and funny but goes too fast, grades tough, and and tests.

Main concern

Pace and timed assessments feel too tight online.

What students said

“yeah he cool and funny or whatever, but he goes TO fast and grades tough AND doesnt give and test.”
MATH15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is standard-to-strict with frequent quizzes, several midterms, and a .

Weekly quizzesMultiple midtermsCumulative finalMyMathLabTimed tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person expect frequent quizzes, three midterms, a , and little .

Weekly quizzes3 midtermsCumulative finalPop quizzesMyMathLab
“Gives 3 midterms and 1 final (final has two parts, part one chapter 9 & 10 part two cumliative)”
MATH105
“he only gives out 3 .”
MO14

Online

Online review reports tough grading and insufficient time on quizzes and tests.

Timed quizzesTimed testsTough grading
“he goes TO fast and grades tough AND doesnt give and test.”
MATH15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an A you'll need to work for it. He'll give you what you deserve.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews (30 in person, 1 online), highlighting effort-reward grading and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Great professor! Understanding, flexible, and insightful.”

⚖️ Effort-Based Grades

38/100

“If you want an A you'll need to work for it. He'll give you what you deserve.”

📅

18/100

“if you miss more than 2 classes good luck.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ . super helpful and attentive to his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He color codes everything.
  • The video lectures are short and clear.
  • He's also very funny and sarcastic but if you need extra help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an A you'll need to work for it.
  • Enge is tough and a lot of the students dropped
  • Do the work and you'll be rewarded!

Theme 3

📌 About Expectations

  • He will not hold your hand or offer E.C.
  • make note cards starting day 1, and watch all the online videos before class
  • You work hard you will pass, if you half arse it you will barely pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

31 reviews across years with , and teaching clarity provide strong, detailed evidence.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1057 reviews
MATH145 reviews
MATHR1055 reviews
MATH1163 reviews
MATH152 reviews
Show 8 more courses
R1052 reviews
MATH1 review
MATH1061 review
MATHR0091 review
MATHR1161 review
MO141 review
R0141 review
STATSR1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3