AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Margaret Newville

DH40 · DH43 · DH0011 · DH23 · CLINIC · DHDH23 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want strict, board-focused dental hygiene training and can handle high standards; avoid if you need constant warmth and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing DH instructorBoard-exam focusedOrganized and fair for someHarsh for others
  • , and prepares students extremely well for dental hygiene boards.
  • , and harsh on minor point deductions.
  • Overall experience is highly split, so outcomes seem to depend on fit with program rigor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some students earn strong outcomes through hard work, but and high difficulty without free grades.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Dental hygiene content is serious program-level work, with mixed difficulty ratings around moderate to hard.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

as mandatory; other comments .

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendations split between board-prep praise and .

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Supporters call her fair and consistent, while .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Program-style dental hygiene work and high expectations suggest a moderate-to-serious load rather than light busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong organization and board prep praise are offset by intense complaints about clarity and attitude.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews imply both clinical or course performance standards and board-oriented .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

for board prep and support or harshly criticized as unfair and demoralizing.

Main concern

Inconsistent student experiences, with and .

What students said

“When I took my boards, I was way more prepared than students from other programs.”
DH43
“ and it's obvious she loves teaching.”
DH40
“HORRIBLE!!!!! , docks down points for really dumb reasons.”
DH23

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students highlight board readiness more than specific classroom proctoring tools or open-book policies.

Board exam preparationProgram clinical standards

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize board preparation and do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book classroom exams.

Board exam preparation
“When I took my boards, I was way more prepared than students from other programs.”
DH43

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“When I took my boards, I was way more prepared than students from other programs.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 polarized in-person dental hygiene reviews. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“This instructor is fantastic! and it's obvious she loves teaching.”

📘 Board Prep Strength

85/100

“She was right on with what I would need to pass easily.”

⚖️

40/100

“ really dumb reasons.”

👎 Polarizing Reputation

20/100

“This instructor is by far the . She is HORRIBLE.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and it's obvious she loves teaching.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She expected me to try my hardest and didn't let me accept mediocrity.
  • .
  • She is very fair and consistent.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • We couldn't have done it without you and the rest of the Oxnard faculty.
  • I feel so good about my experience at OCDH!
  • She is horrible to her students! JUST Horrible!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed but highly polarized in-person reviews from 2010-2015 give useful signal with limited sample size and no recent consensus.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CLINIC1 review
DH00111 review
DH231 review
DH401 review
DH431 review
Show 1 more courses
DHDH231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values