AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Jones

ENGR101 · ENG102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are already strong in English and want a demanding writing class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerChallenging WritingInconsistent RubricsHeavy Essay LoadNot Beginner FriendlyMixed Humor
  • Course is writing-heavy with , and research papers.
  • Help can feel rude or unclear and guidelines are called inconsistent.
  • if you already write well and want a real challenge, not an easy pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One strong writer earned an A, but others warn weak English students will struggle hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and research make this a real intellectual grind.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

; unless you are already strong in English.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

She reportedly never awards 100% and expects strong existing English skills.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tons of quizzes, many essays, group projects, and a research paper pile up quickly.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

Some like the challenge and humor, but and help are poor or rude.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of in-class essays, research paper, group work, and many quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Three in-person English reviews describe a think-hard, write-a-lot class with uneven clarity and limited support.

Main concern

and unhelpful or rude responses when students ask for help.

What students said

“This is not for people who want an easy class to pass. She will make you think, do group projects, plenty of in-class essays and .”
ENGR101
“Very inconsistent with her guidelines to what she wants done ex. Essays and in class work.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on frequent quizzes and .

In-Class EssaysMany QuizzesResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and longer papers with uneven guidelines.

In-Class EssaysMany QuizzesResearch Paper
“Gives you tons of quizzes and over 4 essays.”
ENG102
“plenty of in-class essays and ”
ENGR101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless your very good in English.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting challenge, workload, and support concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧠 Course Challenge

32/100

“This is not for people who want an easy class to pass. She will make you think, do group projects, plenty of in-class essays and .”

📋

30/100

“Very inconsistent with her guidelines to what she wants done ex. Essays and in class work.”

👎 Support Issues

28/100

“if you ask her for help she will have a rude response to give you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I enjoyed the class and her ranting and weird humor
  • She will not go over grammar, either

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is not for people who want an easy class to pass
  • Gives you tons of quizzes and over 4 essays
  • Doesn't believe in giving 100%

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three reasonably detailed reviews from 2013-2014 are directionally consistent but the sample is still small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1012 reviews
ENG1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values