AI Rate Professor

English

Patty Dozen

ENGL95 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

appear; one vague 1/5 rating is a red flag.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSingle vague reviewVery low qualityUnclear expectationsInsufficient dataProceed carefully
  • Only one review exists and it is extremely vague.
  • That review rates quality at the bottom with no concrete teaching detail.
  • Students cannot reliably predict workload, grading, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Difficulty was rated 1, but the comment gives no grade outcome or effort details.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Reported difficulty is very low, yet there is almost no content description.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

A solitary 1/5 quality rating with a dismissive comment is not a positive endorsement.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in the single review.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Only review assigns quality 1 with no concrete teaching praise.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One vague in-person ENGL95 review gives a 1/5 quality score with no actionable detail.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Think about it, you be the judge!!”
ENGL95

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Think about it, you be the judge!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 vague in-person review with minimal detail. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Sparse Evidence

12/100

“Think about it, you be the judge!!”

📉 Quality Signal

15/100

“Think about it, you be the judge!!”

Theme 1

📝

  • Think about it, you be the judge!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

12/100

Evidence confidence

One vague 2011 review with no grade, tags, or concrete examples yields very low reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values