AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Sharon Jones

PSY130 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Promising if you want a knowledgeable psych instructor, but verify with more recent students first.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnows the materialHigh quality ratingLimited reviewsCompetent lecturer
  • Single five-star review praises subject knowledge.
  • Difficulty is rated higher (4), so content is not a free ride.
  • Sample size is too small for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Difficulty is rated 4 with no grade outcomes, so an A likely needs real effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty 4 suggests standard-to-challenging psych content rather than an easy intro.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

The sole review is strongly positive on knowledge, implying a worthwhile pick if that holds.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in the available review.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

85/100

Single student highlights strong subject mastery and gives a 5 quality score.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person PSY130 student rates her top-tier for knowing the material, with solid difficulty.

Main concern

Only one dated review, so workload and .

What students said

“Knows what she's talking about.”
PSY130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Knows what she's talking about.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting subject knowledge. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“Knows what she's talking about.”

📈 Course Challenge

45/100

“Knows what she's talking about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Knows what she's talking about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Knows what she's talking about.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short review from 2010 limits reliability across grading, workload, and teaching consistency.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSY1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values