AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Kiefer Rich

PYCH101 · PSYC123 · PSYC161 · 13058CRN · PSY101 · PSCH101 · PSYCH135 · PSYC101 · CRN53056 · PSYC10102071 · PSYCH101 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
48.15%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an easy psych grade and can tolerate very opinionated, potentially uncomfortable lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHighly opinionatedEasy tests from homeworkClassroom controversyHilarious for someParticipation points
  • Older reviews often call him funny, easy, and engaging with .
  • Recent PSYC161 reviews allege highly inappropriate and offensive classroom comments.
  • Grades remain easy for many, but recommendation and comfort vary sharply by era and student values.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students , and high grades if you do the work and ignore the rants.

Almost all evidence is in person; the single online review is positive but thin.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

80/100

Intro psych material with and .

In-person majority; online sample is too small to compare difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skip-class risk.

In-person participation emphasis; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

, but recent reviews urge reporting him and older ones split on opinion dumping.

Recent in-person PSYC161 reviews drive the ; older reviews are more mixed-positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Exams are easy and homework-aligned, but and not always counted.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

, and one final paper for most sections; workload is light for college psych.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person reviews; online has no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some find him hilarious and engaging, but many reject heavy personal opinions and recent reports describe a hostile classroom climate.

Format shift

; one online review is positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of weekly homework, four or so , and a .

Format shift

; online lacks detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

tests, but recent students strongly object to personal beliefs shared in class.

Main concern

Recent allegations of creepy or offensive classroom statements and .

What students said

“This guy is a creep”
PSYC161
“The ! He tries to make the classes as enjoyable as possible”
PSYC101
“He openly shares his perverted beliefs, feelings and ideologies with the class and that made me feel very uncomfortable.”
PSYC161

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Single older online review is briefly positive with no policy detail.

Main concern

Too little online evidence to judge current online experience.

What students said

“So ”
PSYCH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are widely described as homework-identical and easy if you study the assignments.

Exams from homeworkMultiple choice homeworkFinal paperParticipation points

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

homework and a final paper is typically easy.

Homework-mirrored exams4 exams plus final paperEasy if you study homework
“ and effective (mostly multiple choice) and the !”
PSYC101
“There are 4 exams throughout the class, questions on exams were all taken straight from the homework.”
PSYCH101

Online

Single online .

“So ”
PSYCH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class is super easy. He does have a lot of weird beliefs and is very opinionated. But if you ignore all that and just focus on doing the work you will pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (1 online, 26 in person), contrasting older easy-fun praise with recent comfort and ethics concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He took every opportunity he had to cram his opinion down our throats.”

📈 Easy Grade

84/100

“easy as to pass just do the homework and and you should pass the class with a good grade”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

15/100

“Somebody please report this guy. He shouldn't even be working at any school.”

😂 Humor (older reviews)

70/100

“He's super hilarious and class is never boring.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Controversies

  • This guy is a creep
  • I hated his class and him as well. He openly shares his perverted beliefs
  • Says a lot of weird stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy class.
  • the do is memorize the hw
  • Writing the

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are so engaging and so entertaining
  • Funny guy, decent teacher.
  • most of his lectures come from a powerpoint which came from the publisher which made his lectures a little boring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews with a : older mixed-positive versus clustered 2025 allegations; sample size and detail support medium-high confidence.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYC1617 reviews
PSYCH1017 reviews
PSYC1015 reviews
13058CRN1 review
CRN530561 review
Show 6 more courses
PSCH1011 review
PSY1011 review
PSYC101020711 review
PSYC1231 review
PSYCH1351 review
PYCH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2