AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Elizabeth Meehan

ENG205 · HUMA201 · HUMA101 · ENG101 · HUM201 · ENG220 · HUM106 · HUM101 · ENGENG · ENGL205 · ENGL101 · HUM102 · 81 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her only if and readings; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkSo Many PapersMonotone LecturesCaring but DisorganizedReading Heavy
  • Expect weekly essays, long films, and .
  • Many find lectures boring, off-topic, and .
  • She often cares and helps in office hours if you put in the writing work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Content is not genius-level hard, but and volume mean an A still takes steady work.

Online older religions courses felt more fair; some online HUM101 felt brutally assignment-heavy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is approachable but packing of , and .

Similar volume online and in person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

.

Most recent in-person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; outcomes depend on tolerance for essays and dry lectures.

Older online World Religions skews recommend; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her a tough English-style grader; and .

Format shift

more often.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and frequent quizzes stack up fast.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy paper/video load; online compresses it into weekly modules.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Caring and knowledgeable for some, but monotone, tangential, and .

Format shift

Online religions reviews rate .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and weekly busywork more than big sit-down exams.

Format shift

Online emphasizes Canvas quizzes plus essays; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person is often dry and tangent-heavy with lots of papers, though .

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Boring lectures, constantly goes on personal tangents.”
HUMA201
“if you visit her during her office hours she will find some way to help you.”
HUM201
“ !”
HUM101

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

older World Religions fans love structure; newer intro students call it busywork and boring.

Main concern

, and weekly writing volume.

What students said

“Not hard but INSANELY boring”
HUM102
“This was honestly the hardest class I've taken in my entire two years at a community college”
HUM101
“Professor Meehan is a real gem. The class is well structured.”
HUM106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments lean quizzes and writing; some open-book online work, not usually high-stakes proctored exams.

Weekly QuizzesOpen Book WorkEssay HeavyCanvas Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers; one older review notes almost everything online and open book.

Lots of QuizzesEssay HeavyOpen Book
“LOTS of quizzes!”
HUMA201
“Almost everything graded was online and open book, nothing was really difficult as long as you do all the work.”
HUM101

Online

Online comments cite .

Canvas QuizzesEssay HeavyWeekly Tests
“taking the quizzes and .”
HUM106
“at least three due and ”
HUM101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not hard but INSANELY boring”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and and repeated themes.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“the way this teacher lectures is incredibly BORING... there is a severe lack of enthusiasm in her voice.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“An .”

❤️ She Can Care

70/100

“if you visit her during her office hours she will find some way to help you.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • constantly goes on personal tangents
  • monotone voice
  • she tends to steer off topic

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • So many papers
  • Get ready to read
  • Almost everything graded was online and open book

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Meehan does truly care about you passing the class
  • she's a caring professor
  • Professor Meehan is fantastic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

81

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 515
3 out of 510
2 out of 517
1 out of 519

Course coverage

HUM10111 reviews
HUM1069 reviews
ENG2057 reviews
HUM2017 reviews
ENGL2055 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENG1012 reviews
ENG2202 reviews
HUM1022 reviews
HUMA2012 reviews
ENGENG1 review
ENGL1011 review
HUMA1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1