AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carlos De La Lama

MATH121 · MATH252 · MATH96 · MAT151 · CALC1 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MAT96 · CALCULUS1 · MATH251 · CALC · 153 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
39.66%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong, self-directed math student and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyPearson Self-TeachPolarizingOverwhelming Homework
  • Many students call the workload unmanageable and .
  • A minority of hardcore math students praise deep lectures and strong preparation.
  • Online sections often run through MyLab/Pearson with little live teaching support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earn A grades, but , and huge effort for top marks.

Both online and ; online adds high-stakes finals and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Average difficulty is high and students repeatedly call calculus content fast, dense, and exam-driven.

Online and ; online pain often comes from self-teaching on Pearson.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, with participation mattering and .

; online often enforces participation through MyLab work.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and most recent comments urge students to choose anyone else.

A few older in-person MATH252 fans still recommend him; online majority says stay away.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate and students report .

Format shift

Online students especially note harsh exams and .

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Weekly problem counts of 70-100+, homework every few days, and long exams are common complaints.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize nonstop Pearson sets; .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A small group finds lectures excellent, but many say he is disengaged, rude, or leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

In-person has both inspired fans and hostile-climate critics; online more often feels like a facilitator-only course.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Courses are described as and limited recovery if .

Format shift

Both formats stress exams; online often uses two attempts but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call him inspiring for serious math , and crushing exams.

Main concern

Hostile classroom climate and .

What students said

“Genuinely if you have to take him, just wait another .”
MATH251
“By far the best calc prof I have had. His perspective of 3D vector calc was super interesting”
MATH252
“Professor De la Lama creates a hostile environment that discourages everyone from participating”
MATH151

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are frequently described as Pearson/MyLab-driven with , and minimal instructor engagement.

Main concern

Unmanageable problem sets and exams that fail students who were otherwise strong.

What students said

“Stay away. This class is horrendous and set up for failure. Unmanageable amounts of homework (70-100+ problems a week)”
MATH252
“He doesn't even teach. This class is entirely taught by the online Pearson textbook”
151
“I highly suggest looking into taking another professor, this whole semester I taught myself”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, with high stakes and limited support materials.

Test HeavyTricky ExamsProctored OnlineTwo Attempts SometimesFinal Can Fail Course

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as unreasonable, long, and poorly aligned with .

Hard In-Person ExamsTest HeavyNo Curve Often
“The .”
MATH252
“If you want an A in his course you will have to put in everything you've got and then some.”
MATH252
“the ”
MATH252

Online

Online comments mention proctored tests, limited formula sheets, MyLab exams, and occasional second attempts.

Proctored ExamsTwo AttemptsMyLab TestsHigh-Stakes Final
“ and and the only thing that you are allowed to use is a formula sheet”
MATH121
“ . he gave me back many points since the computer grade me wrong several times.”
MATH150
“The one thing I appreciate was that we had two attempts for online exams.”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay away. This class is horrendous and set up for failure. Unmanageable amounts of homework (70-100+ problems a week) that takes like 14+ hours to complete.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting workload, exams, and polarized teaching views. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

32/100

“this man by far has been the career”

📚 Workload Shock

14/100

“Unmanageable amounts of homework (70-100+ problems a week) that takes like 14+ hours to complete”

🎯 Hardcore Fan View

88/100

“By far the best calc prof I have had. His perspective of 3D vector calc was super interesting and engaging”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't even teach. This class is entirely taught by the online Pearson textbook
  • His lectures were really bad, you will get stuck for hours on end for this class
  • The professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very tricky exams worth 40% of your grade that don't reflect the homework
  • , but and therefore class
  • If you want an A in his course you will have to put in everything you've got

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • creates a hostile environment that discourages everyone from participating
  • He comes off very aggressive
  • he is so mean that it's hard to approach him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

153

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews span years with consistent themes of , and a sharp split between fans and avoiders.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 513
3 out of 58
2 out of 521
1 out of 572

Course coverage

MATH25214 reviews
MATH1509 reviews
1507 reviews
1513 reviews
MATH1213 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MAT1512 reviews
MAT962 reviews
MATH1512 reviews
MATH2512 reviews
1191 review
1411 review
CALC1 review
CALC11 review
CALCULUS11 review
MATH961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

15

A 13 · A- 2

B range

6

B 4 · B- 2

C range

4

C 4

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2