AI Rate Professor

Biology

Minxiu Wang

BIOL107 · BIOL205 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will study hard, especially in BIOL107; be cautious in tougher micro sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesTest Heavy BiologyCaring SupportFair When PreparedMixed by Course Level
  • BIOL107 students , and fair support; BIOL-205 reviews are more critical of tests and clarity.
  • Success usually means heavy studying, note-taking, and ; some and cheat sheets help.
  • Attendance and participation matter, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Many As in 107 with solid study and occasional , but 205 exams and .

Most grade success stories are in-person BIOL107; the single online review earned a C.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college biology difficulty: doable with study hours, tougher in accelerated or micro courses.

In-person 107 feels more manageable; 205 and 8-week formats feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory with participation mattering for success.

hybrid and almost all in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and care, tempered by sharp 205 avoid warnings.

Recommendation is strongest for in-person 107; online sample is too small to split further.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Often called fair with review days and some , but and 205 tests can feel picky.

Format shift

In-person fairness praise is common in 107; 205 complains of strict deductions.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and but not universally overwhelming when paced normally.

Format shift

8-week and 205 sections feel heavier; standard 107 workload is more moderate.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many call lectures amazing, passionate, and relatable, though .

Format shift

; the online hybrid lacked custom lecture media.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and and participation supporting.

Format shift

Test-heavy pattern is strongest in in-person 205 reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly praise passionate, engaging lectures and supportive grading in 107, while 205 draws and .

Main concern

and disconnected from lectures in some 205 sections.

What students said

“Professor Wang is fantastic. She's very has a great tone that keeps you engaged through lecture”
BIOL107
“The and don't really match the learning objectives or what's taught in class.”
BIOL-205
“she does allow a single sided cheat sheet for if your willing.”
BIOL107

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

textbook-driven lectures without instructor videos, clear criteria, .

Main concern

Little lecture production beyond textbook reading for the online portion.

What students said

“Lectures was from textbook. She doesn't do powerpoints or make videos on the lectures.”
BIOL107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central; several sections allow a one-sided cheat sheet, while .

Cheat Sheet AllowedTest HeavyLab PracticalsNo Cumulative Exam Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention , and strict lab practical grading.

Single-Sided Cheat SheetTricky Exam QuestionsStrict Lab Practicals
“she does allow a single sided cheat sheet for if your willing.”
BIOL107
“ point deductions for small mistakes.”
BIOL-205

Online

The online/hybrid review notes 2 points per exam cheat sheet and little overall.

Exam Cheat SheetNo Extra Credit
“Had one opportunity for 5 points and 2 points per exam cheat sheet.”
BIOL107

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Wang is an excellent teacher, and you won't regret taking her class! Be and review the material multiple times.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, weighted toward recurring lecture praise and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Lecture Quality

70/100

“Amazing .”

📝

45/100

“The , and it's hard to know how to study for them”

👍

66/100

“I'll definitely be taking her Microbiology class.”

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“ and always willing to support her students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you can tell is passionate about both biology and teaching.
  • She's a great lecturer and very relatable and encouraging.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was very tough but i put in study hours and passed with an A.
  • I found the .
  • There is and NO .

Theme 3

🔬 About Labs & Class Climate

  • . We even ended the semester with a zoo trip!
  • She encourages asking questions if you dont understand.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with good detail but a course split and only one online review limit full confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIOL-2056 reviews
BIOL1076 reviews
436652 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1